| Author |
Message |
ddanz
Vonage Forum Associate


Joined: Oct 14, 2005
Posts: 12
|
| NateHoy wrote: | | ddanz wrote: | | I am a 9-1-1 Operator, and I regularly test my Vonage 9-1-1 capability. |
Pardon the stupidity of my question, but I've been highly trained not to call 911 except in a real emergency. How frequently (do you think) would it be acceptable to call? What would be the correct questions to ask to take MINIMUM operator time? How should I announce? "This is not an emergency, just a test of 911. Do you have time for a test?"
What would be the best times of day to call, when volume would be low and coverage would be high, in general? |
Call the agency that handles your 9-1-1 calls on their non-emergency number and ask them. If you don't know your default agency, call the Sheriff's office for your area, or the Highway Patrol, and ask them who your primary PSAP is, and then call that agency on their non-emergency number to ask the questions you posed above. |
|
|
|
|
 |
karl0755
New Forum Member


Joined: May 27, 2005
Posts: 1
Location: Denver, CO
|
I just read that an appeals court just denied an appeal for smaller Voip companies, other than Vonage, in a joint courts action regarding the FCC's demand and the delay Congress put on for November 28th to stop further sales of Voip until they comply. Vonage has been keenly watching this court appeal. The Text of news headline is attached below as reported by the *AP* 5 hours before this post:
KANSAS CITY, Mo. - A federal appeals court on Tuesday refused to delay new Federal Communications Commission guidelines requiring Internet telephone companies to provide reliable 911 emergency call service.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied a motion filed two weeks ago by a group of Internet telephone companies who claim the regulations are unreasonable.
In May, the FCC ordered providers of Internet-based phone calls, commonly called Voice over Internet Protocol, or Voip, to certify that their customers will be able to reach an emergency dispatcher when they call 911. Dispatchers also must be able to identify the caller's phone number and location.
The companies were given until Nov. 28 to comply, and many providers worried that they would be forced to disconnect customers who didn't have full 911 service.
The FCC issued the order after a series of highly publicized incidents in which Internet phone users were unable to connect with a live emergency dispatch operator when calling 911.
FCC officials clarified their position last week, saying companies that don't achieve reliable E911 service by Nov. 28 will not have to pull the plug on customers. But they will have to discontinue marketing Internet call service and accepting new customers in areas where the companies are not routing 911 calls to emergency response centers.
Jason Talley, president and chief executive of Overland Park, Kan.-based Nuvio Inc., which filed the motion for a stay on Nov. 1, said the FCC's decision ultimately reduces alternatives for customers and stifles innovation.
Talley said he and three other companies that later joined Nuvio's suit _ Louisville, Ky.-based Lightyear Network Solutions LLC; McLean, Va.-based Primus Telecommunications Group Inc.'s subsidiary Lingo Inc.; and Atlanta-based i2 Telecom International Inc. _ will continue to pursue their appeal of the regulations.
Copyright 2005 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
| Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
All times are GMT - 5 Hours | |