Sign up
 Vonage  

       
 
Vonage Forum Menu

Vonage Forums
Vonage VoIP Forum
FlagmaHog Posted:
sale cheap bags
sale replica
handbags
handbags
Nearest to your
...

In The Forum:
Vonage
Topic:
Admitting that your next to set aside can figure up with unp
On Feb 10, 2012 at 00:57:36

wtreker Posted:
Âñå â ïîèñêàõ
òîððåíò òðåêåðû
ðîññèè áåç
ðåãèñòðàöèè , è
÷òî ñàìîå
èíòåðåñíîå
...

In The Forum:
Vonage
Topic:
ìï3 ñêà÷àò
On Feb 10, 2012 at 00:24:10

EntiliHib Posted:
The point of a
hedge is to
provoke kale
exchange for
clients regardless
of market
...

In The Forum:
Vonage
Topic:
EIM
On Feb 09, 2012 at 20:47:35

Ikeman Posted:
I did this last
summer for six
weeks. It worked
perfectly. I also
used a phone that
...

In The Forum:
Vonage
Topic:
can''t get a dialtone using US box in UK
On Feb 09, 2012 at 17:25:55

Ikeman Posted:
I contacted Vonage
and the issue was
escalated to the
Advanced Technical
Support
...

In The Forum:
Vonage
Topic:
DTMF problem with Vonage and Intercall Reservation Plus
On Feb 09, 2012 at 17:11:49

Beardy Posted:
My sister lives in
Italy, her
boyfriend is in
AL. When
travelling he
rings her by
...

In The Forum:
Vonage
Topic:
Problem calling from US to Europe
On Feb 09, 2012 at 10:35:05

cust2005 Posted:
I was having
problems all
yesterday (Feb
2nd). Outbound
calls,
either: ring
...

In The Forum:
Vonage
Topic:
Inbound calls going to network availability number
On Feb 03, 2012 at 10:27:48

rebus Posted:
This morning all
inbound calls from
non-Vonage numbers
are hitting my
cellphone
...

In The Forum:
Vonage
Topic:
Inbound calls going to network availability number
On Feb 02, 2012 at 08:39:05

salytwo Posted:
Hello, I started
my VOIP system and
I need to connect
it to out site of
my country. How
...

In The Forum:
Vonage
Topic:
how to start VOIP with Vonage
On Feb 02, 2012 at 00:13:30

Stevebo Posted:
My Comcast
Internet cable
outlet is located
in a room apart
from where my
Vonage
...

In The Forum:
Vonage
Topic:
Connecting Vonage Box to Wirless Network
On Jan 31, 2012 at 20:55:18


Vonage VoIP Forums

Vonage In The News
Vonage Holdings Corp. Announces Date of Earnings Release and Conference Call for Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2011 Financial

Vonage Chief Executive Officer to Present at the Citi 2012 Entertainment, Media, & Telecommunications Conference

Syndication

Vonage Customer Reviews
Appreciation
Appreciation



Vonage vs. Time Warner Cable SoCal
Vonage vs. Time Warner Cable SoCal



international connection
international connection



VDV21-VD adapter and Vonage service - a winner!
VDV21-VD adapter and Vonage service - a winner!



Should have signed up sooner!!!!
Should have signed up sooner!!!!




Vonage Reviews


Post new topic   Reply to topic  Vonage® VoIP Forum - Vonage News, Reviews And Discussion » Vonage
Author Message
mbressman
New Forum Member
New Forum Member


Joined: Jun 28, 2009
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 1:01 pm    Post subject: Poor Call Quality & Sporadic Issues with Business Lines Reply with quote Back to top

Hi,

I was hoping someone on here might be able to lend me some assistance. I have a client that I set up Vonage for (it's a small company - 2 people - sharing an office with a larger office and they were previously using the larger office's telephones and network) in order to expand to 2 lines and save some money. I arranged to get them 2 business lines with Vonage (plus a free fax line) and 2 Vonage adapters (one adapter for both the fax and one of the business lines and the other adapter for a secondary business line / line for the assistant). Initially, they were using Vonage on a shared T1 line and they had issues with call quality (such as momentary, sporadic drops in the call on their end throughout the day). I then arranged to have Verizon install DSL (768K up / 3 MB down) service for them and moved their entire network over to the DSL line. Aside from using Vonage on the DSL line, they do normal business activity on it (email, web browsing, etc.) as well as usually maintain an outbound VPN connection to another site for most of the day. However, I didn't think this would eat up enough of the bandwidth to cause problems with Vonage, and figured they'd have plenty to solve the existing issues they were having using Vonage on the shared T1 line.

Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to be the case. The client is still reporting that they are experiencing call quality issues with Vonage, especially more in the afternoon although its sporadic and seems to occur almost randomly. However, when they do occur, the quality is so poor (drops throughout the conversation, lags, etc.) that they have to disconnect and then redial the other party.

The network is set up as follows:
Code:
DSL -> Netgear Wireless Router running DD-WRT ->
   Patch Panel -> Jack in office -> Linksys 5-port Switch ->
      Vonage Adapter ->
         Phone
         Fax Machine
      Computer #1
      QNAP TS-101 NAS Device
   Wireless Connection to Netgear WGPS606 -> Linksys 5-port Switch ->
      Computer acting as File Server (running FreeNAS)
      Computer #2
      Vonage Adapter ->
         Assistant's Phone


I would imagine that there would be more problems with the wireless connection Vonage adapter, but it seems there are many issues with the wired connection Vonage adapter (to be fair, the wired connection Vonage phone is the one used more often, so more problems would be noticed, but there still shouldn't be any problems at all!).

I ran PingPlotter on Computer #1 above (which is plugged into the same 5-port switch as the Vonage adapter) and it showed an average in the 70's, although there were times when I got different results when the Vonage line was being used. For instance, I believe there was a call being made between sometime around 4:47 PM, and here are the PintPlotter stats for around that time:

"7/17/2009 4:45:48 PM",0,22,22,24,24,25,71,71,70,71,70,70,70
"7/17/2009 4:46:03 PM",0,33,23,25,24,25,71,71,70,71,70,70,70
"7/17/2009 4:46:18 PM",0,228,196,164,174,278,290,260,227,193,180,169,182
"7/17/2009 4:46:33 PM",0,216,227,196,164,175,194,160,126,227,192,292,305
"7/17/2009 4:46:48 PM",0,51,147,244,206,257,271,226,232,243,243,209,169
"7/17/2009 4:47:03 PM",0,173,140,107,81,49,200,168,223,192,200,190,143
"7/17/2009 4:47:18 PM",0,24,25,26,26,77,73,73,242,208,174,154,103
"7/17/2009 4:47:33 PM",0,66,28,25,124,85,137,150,150,118,78,70,174
"7/17/2009 4:47:48 PM",0,112,71,34,24,127,136,142,148,110,91,70,71
"7/17/2009 4:48:03 PM",0,138,330,300,261,224,234,198,163,124,84,74,71
"7/17/2009 4:48:18 PM",0,22,23,24,24,25,71,70,71,71,70,70,71
"7/17/2009 4:48:33 PM",0,109,171,134,95,56,71,73,71,70,232,191,156
"7/17/2009 4:48:48 PM",0,27,22,25,24,24,71,71,71,71,70,70,71
"7/17/2009 4:49:03 PM",0,24,23,34,26,25,71,70,72,220,183,146,108
"7/17/2009 4:49:18 PM",0,35,26,25,24,25,71,71,70,71,70,78,71
"7/17/2009 4:49:33 PM",0,22,23,190,152,117,126,87,72,70,93,278,212
"7/17/2009 4:49:48 PM",0,22,22,24,65,166,173,134,95,71,70,70,71
"7/17/2009 4:50:03 PM",0,22,23,25,24,25,71,71,211,172,133,92,74

Another one was apparently made at 4:38 PM, and here are the PingPlotter stats for around that time:

"7/17/2009 4:36:48 PM",0,22,22,24,24,25,71,101,219,180,140,101,70
"7/17/2009 4:37:03 PM",0,22,22,198,159,120,128,88,71,72,71,70,71
"7/17/2009 4:37:18 PM",0,112,74,37,24,25,70,232,192,154,114,75,70
"7/17/2009 4:37:33 PM",0,22,22,24,31,205,162,129,94,71,108,236,72
"7/17/2009 4:37:48 PM",0,24,25,26,26,27,73,237,203,170,152,119,85
"7/17/2009 4:38:03 PM",0,54,22,24,24,25,71,230,191,152,111,71,70
"7/17/2009 4:38:18 PM",0,22,22,24,29,24,71,70,71,71,70,70,70
"7/17/2009 4:38:33 PM",0,53,36,24,24,30,221,188,158,125,111,94,71
"7/17/2009 4:38:48 PM",0,23,23,96,24,25,71,70,70,88,93,70,71
"7/17/2009 4:39:03 PM",0,22,22,26,33,24,71,70,82,71,70,101,83
"7/17/2009 4:39:18 PM",0,22,22,24,24,25,71,70,71,122,86,70,70
"7/17/2009 4:39:33 PM",0,22,22,25,25,25,221,187,153,118,85,72,71
"7/17/2009 4:39:48 PM",0,109,76,45,24,25,71,226,192,160,126,93,70
"7/17/2009 4:40:03 PM",0,22,22,24,24,25,71,72,71,71,70,70,71
"7/17/2009 4:40:18 PM",0,22,22,24,187,154,166,132,97,71,70,70,234
"7/17/2009 4:40:33 PM",0,23,24,140,27,28,73,73,73,72,72,72,72

I honestly don't know how to proceed at this point. Is this an issue with Verizon, with Vonage, with my network layout or wiring, or something else? Should I attempt to lower the call quality bandwidth via Vonage's control panel (I believe I can do that somewhere - maybe via their online web interface)? Is it possible it's a bad adapter? Is there something else I can try? Any help is greatly appreciated, as the client is getting extremely frustrated and I want to do whatever I can to assist them and resolve this issue. Any help is greatly appreciated!! Thanks!

_________________
Marc
Marc Bressman's Home Page
Falcon Computer Consulting
Contact Marc Bressman
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number
trekologer
Vonage Forum Evangelist
Vonage Forum Evangelist


Joined: Dec 04, 2005
Posts: 350

PostPosted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

First, I am not completely familiar with PingPlotter but I'm going to assume those numbers are the round trip times to some constant destination. If that's the case they're pretty darn bad. Now the question is why are they that bad: is it the connection, the the way the connection is being used, or both? To try to narrow that down, you'll want to run the same test when there is little to no traffic (ie: off hours) and compare. If you get the same results, you're probably looking at a problem with the connection.

In either case, you will want to configure your router to give priority to your voice traffic. On DD-WRT, you need to do two things: enter your upload and download speeds and select the service type to give priority to. To determine your upload and download speeds, run several speed tests on different websites and take the average of all of them. Then enter 80% of the average in the appropriate fields. Next, select the service to give priority to: rtp (this is the protocol uses to send the voice traffic) and set priority to "premium".
View user's profile Send private message
mbressman
New Forum Member
New Forum Member


Joined: Jun 28, 2009
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 10:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

Yup, I believe that's what those #'s are (although I'm not that familiar with the software either - it was suggested to me by Vonage - I'm still waiting for them to get back to me so I can provide them with the data). They seem bad during these phone calls, but in general I thought that anything less than a few hundred milliseconds was OK? The average for the entire 36 or so hours I ran it was around 75 or so milliseconds.

Here are some from around 5 AM in the morning Saturday:

"7/18/2009 5:21:48 AM",0,26,23,24,24,25,71,70,71,70,116,171,70
"7/18/2009 5:22:03 AM",0,22,22,25,24,24,71,70,71,71,70,70,71
"7/18/2009 5:22:18 AM",0,22,22,25,89,25,71,71,71,71,70,70,70
"7/18/2009 5:22:33 AM",0,22,22,24,88,25,71,70,71,71,70,70,70
"7/18/2009 5:22:48 AM",0,22,22,25,53,24,71,71,71,70,70,70,71
"7/18/2009 5:23:03 AM",0,22,22,24,25,158,71,71,70,72,70,70,70
"7/18/2009 5:23:18 AM",0,22,22,24,24,112,71,71,71,70,70,70,70
"7/18/2009 5:23:33 AM",0,22,22,24,24,25,71,71,70,70,70,71,71
"7/18/2009 5:23:48 AM",0,22,22,24,24,25,71,71,71,70,70,70,71
"7/18/2009 5:24:03 AM",0,21,22,24,24,25,71,71,70,71,70,70,70
"7/18/2009 5:24:18 AM",0,22,22,24,24,24,71,70,70,71,70,70,70
"7/18/2009 5:24:33 AM",0,22,22,24,24,24,71,71,71,71,70,70,70
"7/18/2009 5:24:48 AM",0,22,22,24,24,25,71,71,70,71,70,70,71
"7/18/2009 5:25:03 AM",0,21,22,24,24,25,71,71,71,71,100,160,71
"7/18/2009 5:25:18 AM",0,22,22,24,24,24,71,70,70,70,70,70,70
"7/18/2009 5:25:33 AM",0,22,22,24,24,25,71,71,71,71,70,70,70
"7/18/2009 5:25:48 AM",0,21,22,24,24,25,70,70,71,71,70,70,71
"7/18/2009 5:26:03 AM",0,21,23,24,24,25,71,71,70,71,70,70,71

When compared to the ones I previously posted, does this help narrow anything down?

As far as configuring the router, can you provide some more guidance? For instance, should the port be WAN and the packet scheduler be HTB? And I'm assuming I should leave "optimize for gaming" unchecked? Also, why does it need my uplink and downlink speeds? And, would it make more sense to just prioritize all traffic from the Vonage adapters by using its IP address under the "Netmask Priority" section or by using its MAC address under the "MAC Priority" section?

Thanks again for your help and assistance!

_________________
Marc
Marc Bressman's Home Page
Falcon Computer Consulting
Contact Marc Bressman
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number
mbressman
New Forum Member
New Forum Member


Joined: Jun 28, 2009
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

Also, what priority should I set the RTP protocol too (i.e. premium, exempt, express, standard, etc.)?

Thanks.

_________________
Marc
Marc Bressman's Home Page
Falcon Computer Consulting
Contact Marc Bressman
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number
trekologer
Vonage Forum Evangelist
Vonage Forum Evangelist


Joined: Dec 04, 2005
Posts: 350

PostPosted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

A ping measures the round trip time to an internet host and back so the time to from you to that host is roughly half the time ping reports. This is called latency: the time is takes to get data from you to the destination. For a voice over IP service (such as Vonage) you want your one-way latency to be as low as possible but anything under 75-100ms should be fine as that shouldn't introduce noticeable delay to the audio.

However, the biggest problems typically are not latency but jitter. Jitter is the variation is latency from one packet to another. Your telephone adapter can adequately compensate for jitter up to about 40ms or so, anything higher is going to cause packet discards. Those are packets that reach the other end but are received too late.

As for how to setup the QoS in DD-WRT... port is WAN, packet scheduler HTB, optimize for gaming off. The reason that it needs to know your uplink and downlink speeds is to know what bandwidth is available and when it needs to kick in the prioritization and limit the throughput of lower priority traffic. The reason that I suggest to set the service priority verses netmask or MAC is that should you ever change your Vonage devices (replace one, add another) or the IP address changes (as it does with dynamically assigned ones), you don't need to adjust the QoS rules. The voice traffic will always be rtp while the other identifiers may change. Set the priority to premium.
View user's profile Send private message
mbressman
New Forum Member
New Forum Member


Joined: Jun 28, 2009
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

Trekloger - thanks for all the info. So, if the jitter is what's causing the issue, what can be done to resolve that? Would that be an issue with the ISP? Do you think making the changes to the QoS settings on the DD-WRT router will solve those issues?

I've made the changes (I actually set them up already, but thank you for confirming that I've set them up correctly!) and informed the end-users that they should try it and let me know whether it's better or not - so I guess I'll have an idea soon enough as to whether it solved the issue or not.

I also used the Bandwidth Saver feature of Vonage and reduced the bandwidth to 50K for each of the two adapters - I figured that considering the quality is sporadically horrible already, reducing the bandwidth couldn't hurt and might even help - what do you think?

Thanks again!

_________________
Marc
Marc Bressman's Home Page
Falcon Computer Consulting
Contact Marc Bressman
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number
mbressman
New Forum Member
New Forum Member


Joined: Jun 28, 2009
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 2:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

So after making the changes, it seems as if the Vonage adapter that is wired seems to be working better, while the Vonage adapter that is wireless is still having some issues. Obviously, I'm going to go and try to wire that Vonage adapter to see if that solves the issues.

Does anyone have any more suggestions as to how to make sure I have fully fixed the issue? The QoS changes and the bandwidth saver changes seem to have done the trick, but I'm thinking I should get in touch with Verizon (the ISP) to discuss the jitter issue - does that seem like a good idea?

_________________
Marc
Marc Bressman's Home Page
Falcon Computer Consulting
Contact Marc Bressman
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


All times are GMT - 5 Hours

Vonage Service Plans


Vonage VoIP Members
Members List Members
New sawendye7g
New Today 1
Yesterday 18
Total 63399

Who Is On Site
Visitors 116
Members 0
Total 116


Vonage VoIP Forum Members:
Login Here
Not a Member? You can Register Here
As a registered member you will have access to the VoIP Speed Test, Vonage Service Announcements and post comments in the
Vonage VoIP Forums

Vonage Stock Price
Value: 2.92
Change:   0.00
Up to 15 Minute Delay

Site Search
 




1 Unlimited calling and other services for all residential plans are based on normal residential use by single-family household members. A combination of factors are used to determine abnormal use, including but not limited to: the number of unique numbers called, international calls forwarded, minutes used and other factors. Subject to our Reasonable Use Policy and Terms of Service.

HIGH SPEED INTERNET REQUIRED. † LIMITED TIME OFFER, VALID FOR NEW LINES ONLY. RATES EXCLUDE INTERNET SERVICE, SURCHARGES, FEES AND TAXES. As a subscriber to Vonage service, you agree to be bound by the Terms of Service. See www.vonage.com/tos for details. ¤ Where available. The number transfer process takes approximately 10 business days from the time you confirm your transfer request. Alarms, TTY and other systems may not be compatible. Vonage 911 service operates differently than traditional 911. See www.vonage.com/911 for details.

www.vonage-forum.com is not an official Vonage support website & is independently operated.
All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owners. All comments are property of their posters.
All other www.vonage-forum.com content is © Copyright 2002 - 2012 by 4Sight Media LLC.

Thinking of signing up for Vonage but have questions?
Business and Residential customers can call Toll Free 24 hours a day at: 1-888-692-8074
No Vonage Promotional Codes or Coupon Codes are required at www.vonage.com.

[ | | | | | ]

Vonage Forum Site Maps

Vonage | VoIP Forum | How VoIP Works | Wiring and Installation Page Two | International Rate Plans 2 | Internet Phone
Promotion | Vonage Review | VoIP | Broadband Phone | Free Month | VoIP | Phone Service | Rebate
Phone | Latest News | VoIP Acronyms | Vonnage | Vontage | Deal | Site Maps

The Vonage Forum provides the Vonage sign up Best Offer Promotion Deal as a means to offset our cost.
If you are considering signing up for Vonage and have found our Vonage News, Customer Reviews, Forums
& all other parts of this site useful, please use our Vonage FREE Month sign up offer Deal Coupon.


Vonage VoIP Phone Service is redefining communications by offering consumers
& small business VoIP Internet phones, an affordable alternative to traditional phone service.
The Vonage VoIP Forum Generated This Page In: 0.45 Seconds and 420 Pages In The Last 60 Seconds
The Vonage VoIP Forum