Sign up
 Vonage  

       
 
Vonage Forum Menu

Vonage Forums
Vonage VoIP Forum
mikebrown Posted:
Hello, I think
you should consult
it with the Expert
they can surely
help you
...

In The Forum:
Hard Wiring - Installation
Topic:
Hardwiring in a Rental House
On Jun 24, 2017 at 09:15:34

Haniltery Posted:
For wipe call
history also some
of the offline, in
gengral , it
usually apply to
...

In The Forum:
Vonage
Topic:
How to Delete call history from online account?
On May 09, 2017 at 06:14:26

diana87 Posted:
You have to use
VPN service to
bypass
Geo-restrictions
and get free
access while
...

In The Forum:
Vonage
Topic:
Recent calling problem from Egypt
On May 02, 2017 at 17:28:06

dconnor Posted:
What is the main
number on the
account? And
which one is the
virtual number?
...

In The Forum:
Vonage UK
Topic:
How do you call 999
On Apr 27, 2017 at 18:52:02

Trafford Posted:
Seems like a
simple
question. We
rely exclusively
on a Vonage system
for our
...

In The Forum:
Vonage UK
Topic:
How do you call 999
On Apr 27, 2017 at 10:42:50

diazou Posted:
Hello, It's
compatible with
Android your phone
software
? Thanks!
...

In The Forum:
Vonage
Topic:
IP PBX for small business
On Mar 28, 2017 at 12:42:33

jeddaisg Posted:
Hi all We have
a Vonage VOIP
system for our
office. Lately,
our call quality
...

In The Forum:
Vonage
Topic:
Ethernet Cable; Wiring schematic? 568-B?
On Feb 23, 2017 at 18:33:52

beast321 Posted:
I don't know if
you heard, that
many more
Dreamcast games
are opened up
recently.
...

In The Forum:
Fax - Tivo - Alarms
Topic:
Using phone as a dial up modem for Dreamcast Gaming
On Feb 16, 2017 at 03:16:51

Av8rix Posted:
Sorry to start a
new thread on an
old topic but when
I google “Vonage
MAC address
...

In The Forum:
Vonage
Topic:
New adapter and router -- MAC change
On Jan 11, 2017 at 01:07:21

tplink Posted:
Im trying to add
my HT802 vonage
adapter to my home
network. I
currently have
...

In The Forum:
Hard Wiring - Installation
Topic:
Vonage behind switch
On Dec 05, 2016 at 12:35:11


Vonage VoIP Forums

Vonage In The News
Vonage Expands International Presence with Investments in Asia Pacific Region

Vonage to Present at the Oppenheimer 20th Annual Technology, Internet & Communications Conference

Syndication

Vonage Customer Reviews
Salt Lake City: impressions after several months
Salt Lake City: impressions after several months



Review: My First Day With Vonage, Excellent!
Review: My First Day With Vonage, Excellent!



Great Price, No Complaints
Great Price, No Complaints



You need some common sense.
You need some common sense.



Vonage Customer Review: One month with Vonage, and...
Vonage Customer Review: One month with Vonage, and...




Vonage Reviews


Post new topic   Reply to topic  Vonage® VoIP Forum - Vonage News, Reviews And Discussion » Vonage Stock
Author Message
rudedog40
Vonage Forum Junior
Vonage Forum Junior


Joined: May 30, 2006
Posts: 29

PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 2:43 pm    Post subject: looks like it goes futher Reply with quote Back to top

Reading more of the latest lawsuit, it looks like it goes further than just the Vonage customers who bought stock through the IPO. This one looks like it wants to have ANYONE who bought Vonage stock (either pre-IPO, or through normal brokerage account channels). These lawyers are claiming the stock tanked due to the items they have listed in the lawsuit, including the part about the Vonage customers who refused to pay for their shares. So if this lawsuit goes through, you might as well write off Vonage. They would essentially have to refund the millions of dollars they received in the IPO back to the investors who purchased the stock. They do that, bankruptcy will soon follow.
View user's profile Send private message
ckudrna
Full Forum Member
Full Forum Member


Joined: Apr 29, 2005
Posts: 62

PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 3:24 pm    Post subject: Re: looks like it goes futher Reply with quote Back to top

rudedog40 wrote:
Reading more of the latest lawsuit, it looks like it goes further than just the Vonage customers who bought stock through the IPO. This one looks like it wants to have ANYONE who bought Vonage stock (either pre-IPO, or through normal brokerage account channels). These lawyers are claiming the stock tanked due to the items they have listed in the lawsuit, including the part about the Vonage customers who refused to pay for their shares. So if this lawsuit goes through, you might as well write off Vonage. They would essentially have to refund the millions of dollars they received in the IPO back to the investors who purchased the stock. They do that, bankruptcy will soon follow.


I do think that there is no question as to the future of Vonage. This company, due to the splendid work of upper management, and the aid of the Investment banks, have guaranteed an end to this company within the next 12 months. The money Vonage is going to have to spend to defend lawsuits and make good on this IPO will evaporate a great deal of the proceeds of the IPO.

Now, looking back, it would have been way easier to offer the IPO at a more reasonable price per share than to offer it at $17, deal with customers who will not pay, and defend the company against a host of litigation that is soon to follow. I did not lose money on this trade, I got my shares written off, but I will certainly join a class action suit if it includes folks other than who were wronged by the IPO. I feel very sorry for the folks that did lose money on this. They lost money because they believed in the company and it turned around and screwed them.

It will be interesting to see in the next 2-4 months to see what pans out with the non payment of shares and any lawsuits coming in Vonage's direction. I will also be curious to see if the fall in the stock price was due to naked short selling, possibly by the same exact banks that underwrote the deal. Investment Banking has always been about firm reputation, where the reputation of the bank is put on the line. The reputation of these three investment banks most certainly will take a hit. I encourage everyone here to close any and all accounts you have open with Smith Barney and the others, as I feel these firms totally went around the Vonage customers backs.

Lots of folks here like to say that this is all a big game and you lose some and you win some, but when there are so many unknown things that might have gone on with this issue (for example, naked short selling by the issuing houses), the playing field is not level, and it is not as easy as just saying that it was a losing trade. Passing the whole thing off just as a bad trade "oh well" is failing to recognize the countless deceptive acts of both Vonage and the issuing banks. A big step in the evaluation of this will be the result of the NYSE probe of naked short selling on the issuing day.

I am not in an area where I have a telco/cable co that offers Voip service, but when they do, I will certainly switch from Vonage to them, as I feel that Vonage knowingly went behind the customers backs and put the interests of upper management in front of interest in what makes the company tick, the customers. You can disagree if you like, but all the facts reported so far indicate that the banks highballed the ipo price, and that the IPO was nothing else but an exit method for the venture capital investors.
View user's profile Send private message
hbmorty
Vonage Forum Associate
Vonage Forum Associate


Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Posts: 11

PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 3:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

How exactly were you notified that your stock was bought out? Do tell, please. Very Happy
View user's profile Send private message
ckudrna
Full Forum Member
Full Forum Member


Joined: Apr 29, 2005
Posts: 62

PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 3:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

hbmorty wrote:
How exactly were you notified that your stock was bought out? Do tell, please. Very Happy



I called Smith Barney returning a message they left about my failure to pay. I called and they told me my shares were bought out and it will be left at that.
View user's profile Send private message
Kaushal
New Forum Member
New Forum Member


Joined: May 31, 2006
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 4:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

Smith barney sold the shares on 6-June at $11.99. I came to know about it when I got the statement in mail on 11-June. As of now there is no communication from SSB or VG if I owe anything to SSB or VG.
View user's profile Send private message
gomo
Vonage Forum Associate
Vonage Forum Associate


Joined: May 22, 2006
Posts: 19

PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 4:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

If this is true this is going to be a BIG problem. The people that paid(including me) are going to be pissed. We need to confirm that this is all true. I'm not saying that ckudrna is lying but it would not be inconceivable to guess that you may have been told incorrect info. We need to see how this all plays out.
View user's profile Send private message
rudedog40
Vonage Forum Junior
Vonage Forum Junior


Joined: May 30, 2006
Posts: 29

PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 4:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

So you're saying that SB and Vonage knowingly and maliciously knew this stock would tank from the onset? Why would they want to do this, especially since the SEC is srutinizing any major transaction a company takes these days. How do you determine whether a stock is overpriced? It clearly stated in the prospectus the stock would IPO between $16 - $18. Why wouldn't the powers that be red flag this amount and stop the IPO before it opened? Everyone that purchased the stock knew it would come out in this range. There was bad press about this IPO before it became public. Yet you and 10,000 others went ahead and bought the stock anyway. If you didn't think it was worth $17, why did you buy into it? What made you believe, or where did you get your information, that this stock was going to take off? Why would investment banks and others sell the stock short, knowing well that with today's technology and SEC laws (post -Enron) they would probably get caught?

If you've been refunded all your money as you say you have, why should you be allowed to join a class action lawsuit? What have you lost but time? The only individuals who have a right to sue, if they even have a viable reason, are the one's who lost money on the stock.
View user's profile Send private message
xmeyer
Vonage Forum Associate
Vonage Forum Associate


Joined: May 31, 2006
Posts: 20

PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 4:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

gomo wrote:
If this is true this is going to be a BIG problem. The people that paid(including me) are going to be pissed.


I guess I would be annoyed, but it's hard to be pissed. I can't
remember a time I was ever this entertained by a market
transaction. This just goes on and on -- you couldn't make
it up.
View user's profile Send private message
rudedog40
Vonage Forum Junior
Vonage Forum Junior


Joined: May 30, 2006
Posts: 29

PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 4:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

'Naked' short selling is center of looming legal battle
Companies on the defensive seize upon an aggressive form of shorting
E-mail | Print | | Disable live quotes By Alistair Barr, MarketWatch
Last Update: 1:00 AM ET Jun 14, 2006


SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- For years, companies have accused short sellers of manipulating their shares and spreading false information, but rarely have their allegations gone anywhere in court.




Now, after seeking out a more effective basis to make their case, a growing number of companies and class-action attorneys have seized upon a particularly aggressive -- and often illegal -- form of short selling called naked shorting.
Like mainstream short strategies, naked shorting is also a way to bet on a stock dropping -- only it's easier to think of it as shorting on steroids.
In a typical short sale, traders sell borrowed shares and then -- if all goes according to plan - buy them back at a lower price and return them to the lender. The difference is kept as profit.
In naked shorting, a trader shorts a stock without first making necessary arrangements to borrow shares. That often means the seller often fails to deliver the stock to the buyer and the trade can't be settled, running afoul of securities laws.
By one contentious estimate, it's a big problem plaguing more than 10% of stocks on the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq. An NYSE probe into whether naked shorting was used to force down shares of Vonage Holdings Corp. lower during the Internet phone company's May initial public offering has added fuel to the fire.

Because naked short selling involves the violation of technical trading rules, it could be easier to prove than more broadly based accusations like manipulation or conspiracy.
"It's very hard to prove manipulation," said lawyer Barry Barbash, formerly a senior official with the Securities and Exchange Commission. "That pattern of behavior by short sellers has rarely, if ever, been proved in any legal case. It's been alleged and asserted over and over again by companies, but not proved."
"There are a group of bad guys rigging the market by selling tens of millions of shares everyday that they don't own and never deliver."
— Wes Christian, securities lawyer
"There have been instances of enforcement cases against short-selling hedge funds, but these focus on more technical violations of trading rules," he added. Barbash, a partner at the law firm of Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, represents both companies and fund managers on either side of the issue and said he doesn't have opinions on specific cases.
James Angel, associate professor of finance at Georgetown University, said some hedge fund managers have already been charged by the SEC and the National Association of Securities Dealers with violations related to naked shorting.
If companies can gather evidence charting a pattern of rule-breaking by short sellers, then judges and juries could be more open to hearing about other allegations such as manipulation, he explained.
"It would certainly look bad if companies point to these guys and show they have a predilection for breaking rules," Angel said. "Whether a judge and jury buy that in court is another story."
Angel said the legal strategy could end up producing more settlements between companies and short sellers.
Law firms unite
Three class-action law firms, headed by John O'Quinn, are leading the legal push against short sellers and naked short selling.
O'Quinn, who achieved fame for winning big lawsuits against tobacco companies in the 1990's, is joined by two other Houston-based firms, Christian, Smith & Jewell and Heard, Robins, Cloud, Lubel & Greenwood.
The firms are also representing Overstock.com (OSTK : overstock com inc del com
So far, these law firms have spent $25 million on the way toward filing 12 suits involving 10 companies, and they're close to filing another five cases. Ten more suits are in the works and the total may reach 50 by early 2007.
The thrust of their complaints is that naked short selling creates billions of dollars of shares that don't actually exist. Individual investors may unknowingly purchase these "phantom" stocks, undermining the legitimacy of the market.
"There are a group of bad guys rigging the market by selling tens of millions of shares everyday that they don't own and never deliver," lawyer Wes Christian, a partner at Christian, Smith & Jewell, said. "A result of that is that shares of our clients are being artificially devalued."
"We're going to ultimately shed light on this bad behavior," Christian added. "This is killing young Corporate America, costing jobs and cheating people out of hundreds of millions of dollars with fake shares."
Undelivered
There are currently about half a billion shares in the U.S. that have been sold in the past but not delivered for settlement in the required three days, according to Robert Shapiro, a former undersecretary in the Commerce Department under President Bill Clinton, who's researching the issue as a paid consultant for O'Quinn's group.
These so-called fails-to-deliver trades can go on for a long time, and Shapiro estimates that roughly 12% of NYSE and Nasdaq stocks have fails-to-deliver that are at least two months old.
View user's profile Send private message
ckudrna
Full Forum Member
Full Forum Member


Joined: Apr 29, 2005
Posts: 62

PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 4:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

gomo wrote:
If this is true this is going to be a BIG problem. The people that paid(including me) are going to be pissed. We need to confirm that this is all true. I'm not saying that ckudrna is lying but it would not be inconceivable to guess that you may have been told incorrect info. We need to see how this all plays out.


I remember being on here with a host of other people informing all of you to not pay. The whole thing was flawed from the get go. I have zero trust in SB and VG at this point. All any of us got back was talk about how we are bad people because we didnt pay and blah blah.
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


All times are GMT - 5 Hours

Vonage Service Plans


Vonage VoIP Members
Members List Members
New patsykf3
New Today 0
Yesterday 0
Total 101029

Who Is On Site
Visitors 1
Members 0
Total 1


Vonage VoIP Forum Members:
Login Here
Not a Member? You can Register Here
As a registered member you will have access to the VoIP Speed Test, Vonage Service Announcements and post comments in the
Vonage VoIP Forums

Site Search
 






†AK and HI residents pay $29.95 shipping. ††Limited time offer. Valid for residents of the United States (&DC), 18 years or older, who open new accounts. Offer good while supplies last and only on new account activations. One kit per account/household. Offer cannot be combined with any other discounts, promotions or plans and is not applicable to past purchases. Good while supplies last. Allow up to 2 weeks for shipping. Other restrictions may apply.

1Unlimited calling and other services for all residential plans are based on normal residential, personal, non-commercial use. A combination of factors is used to determine abnormal use, including but not limited to: the number of unique numbers called, calls forwarded, minutes used and other factors. Subject to our Reasonable Use Policy and Terms of Service.

2Shipping and activation fees waived with 1-year agreement. An Early Termination Fee (with periodic pro-rated reductions) applies if service is terminated before the end of the first 12 months. Additional restrictions may apply. See Terms of Service for details.

HIGH SPEED INTERNET REQUIRED. †VALID FOR NEW LINES ONLY. RATES EXCLUDE INTERNET SERVICE, SURCHARGES, FEES AND TAXES. DEVICE MAY BE REFURBISHED. If you subscribe to plans with monthly minutes allotments, all call minutes placed from both from your home and registered ExtensionsTM phones will count toward your monthly minutes allotment. ExtensionsTM calls made from mobiles use airtime and may incur surcharges, depending on your mobile plan. Alarms, TTY and other systems may not be compatible. Vonage 911 service operates differently than traditional 911. See www.vonage.com/911 for details.

** Certain call types excluded.

www.vonage-forum.com is not an official Vonage support website & is independently operated.
All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owners. All comments are property of their posters.
All other www.vonage-forum.com content is © Copyright 2002 - 2013 by 4Sight Media LLC.

Thinking of signing up for Vonage but have questions?
Business and Residential customers can call Toll Free 24 hours a day at: 1-888-692-8074
No Vonage Promotion Code or Coupon Codes are required at www.vonage.com to receive any special,
best Vonage cheap deals, free sign up offers or discounts.

[ | | | | | ]

Vonage Forum Site Maps

Vonage | VoIP Forum | How VoIP Works | Wiring and Installation Page Two | International Rate Plans 2 | Internet Phone
Promotion | Vonage Review | VoIP | Broadband Phone | Free Month | Rebate | Vonnage | Vontage | VoIP | Phone Service
Phone | llamadas ilimitadas a Mexico | Latest News | VoIP Acronyms | Deal | Philippines Globe Phone | Site Maps

The Vonage Forum provides the Vonage sign up Best Offer Promotion Deal.
If you are considering signing up for Vonage and have found our Vonage News, Customer Reviews, Forums
& all other parts of this site useful, please use our Vonage Sign up page.


Vonage VoIP Phone Service is redefining communications by offering consumers
& small business VoIP Internet phones, an affordable alternative to traditional phone service.
The Vonage VoIP Forum Generated This Page In: 0.27 Seconds and Pages In The Last 60 Seconds
The Vonage VoIP Forum