Sign up
 Vonage  

       
 
Vonage Forum Menu

Vonage Forums
Vonage VoIP Forum
MichaelMub Posted:
PORN...
In The Forum:
Hard Wiring - Installation
Topic:
The best pron
On Dec 05, 2016 at 22:20:50

Wickyvum Posted:
blocking viagra
viagra emails
viagra without a
doctor
prescription
ed treatments
...

In The Forum:
Hard Wiring - Installation
Topic:
Set-up tight-fisted generics no medicine
On Dec 05, 2016 at 17:40:46

tplink Posted:
Im trying to add
my HT802 vonage
adapter to my home
network. I
currently have
...

In The Forum:
Hard Wiring - Installation
Topic:
Vonage behind switch
On Dec 05, 2016 at 06:35:11

MichaelMub Posted:
PORN...
In The Forum:
Vonage
Topic:
The best pron
On Dec 04, 2016 at 10:22:56

Dwightkaw Posted:
kredyt bez
zaświadcze
24; kredyt bez
zaświadcze
24; o dochodach
...

In The Forum:
Vonage
Topic:
kredyt bez zaświadczeń
On Dec 03, 2016 at 03:27:10

Kevingrarl Posted:
Су
95;ас&
#1085;иl
1;
пі
76;пр&
#1080;&
...

In The Forum:
Vonage
Topic:
Сучас&
On Dec 02, 2016 at 12:51:38

IsaawUnace Posted:
does cialis work
as well as cialis
add.cgi buy
cialis cialis
the team <a
...

In The Forum:
Vonage
Topic:
Condition good pill instead of ed
On Dec 01, 2016 at 11:11:59

MatrickVop Posted:
buy cialis today
columbus oh
generic cialis
buy cialis online
registered users
...

In The Forum:
Vonage
Topic:
Classify miserly pills no means
On Nov 28, 2016 at 10:42:47

dracossumo Posted:
Ко
84;па&
#1085;иn
3; Tritel
пр
77;до
...

In The Forum:
Vonage
Topic:
&#1048;&#1085;&#1090;&#1077;&#1088;&
On Nov 27, 2016 at 23:00:39

DWSupport Posted:
After recent
Vonage update that
took place on the
4th and 5th of
Nov. E-mails with
...

In The Forum:
Vonage
Topic:
Voicemail Not Forwarding to Outlook Accounts
On Nov 10, 2016 at 12:23:26


Vonage VoIP Forums

Vonage In The News
Vonage Holdings Corp. Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2013 Results

Carolyn Katz Elected to Board of Directors of Vonage Holdings Corp.

Syndication

Vonage Customer Reviews
Vonage vs. Time Warner Cable SoCal
Vonage vs. Time Warner Cable SoCal



Vonage UK Review
Vonage UK Review



Vonage Pros and Cons for 2006
Vonage Pros and Cons for 2006



Vonage, a VT2142 and a RTP300, My Experiences - A Detailed Review
Vonage, a VT2142 and a RTP300, My Experiences - A Detailed Review



Salt Lake City: impressions after several months
Salt Lake City: impressions after several months




Vonage Reviews


Post new topic   Reply to topic  Vonage® VoIP Forum - Vonage News, Reviews And Discussion » Vonage Forum Archive
Author Message
blakadher
Vonage Forum Evangelist
Vonage Forum Evangelist


Joined: Dec 23, 2005
Posts: 476
Location: Vancouver, WA

PostPosted: Mon May 15, 2006 9:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

kamnet wrote:
The question should not be whether or not I have something to hide, but whether the government has a valid reason to invade my right to privacy. If the government believes that I truly am a terrorist, the law does give them the right to follow up on that and see. But going to a phone company and asking them to be able to snoop on everybody WITHOUT an order from a judge? That's not investigating whether a few people are terrorists, that is what they call "fishing for evidence", and it is illegal.

Silly me, I demand that the government follows the laws that it creates, both in spirit and in body, rather than try to find ways to evade the laws it creates.

No laws were broken and the phone records were stripped of any individually identifiable data. Also, the phone companies were providing the data voluntarily. You guys are getting all excited about something that's not happening.

_________________
Blakadher Legend
RTP300 behind a D-Link 614+ on Comcast
http://vonage.luthertech.com
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
blakadher
Vonage Forum Evangelist
Vonage Forum Evangelist


Joined: Dec 23, 2005
Posts: 476
Location: Vancouver, WA

PostPosted: Mon May 15, 2006 9:27 am    Post subject: Re: Not having anythig to hide an cause problems Reply with quote Back to top

bigmacnc wrote:
Another thing that is scary is a military person heading any civilian agency because if ordered to present false information, a military person has to honor the order or face severe consequences.

I just noticed this and I wanted to point out that it is complete and utter BS. There are provisions in the UCMJ that preclude soldiers from following unlawful orders. In fact, a soldier would be in more trouble if they followed any unlawful order than if they refused to do so.

_________________
Blakadher Legend
RTP300 behind a D-Link 614+ on Comcast
http://vonage.luthertech.com
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
oz_80
Vonage Forum Junior
Vonage Forum Junior


Joined: May 08, 2006
Posts: 32

PostPosted: Mon May 15, 2006 9:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

Vonage wasn't asked for any customer info by NSA.

NSA only asked the traditional telcos.

Good to know however that in light of what happened Vonage has come out saying they won't give without court order.

These telcos who turned over their customer phone records to NSA will be facing class action lawsuits.

For every 1 million Americans whose records were turned over to NSA, the telcos could be liable for $1 billion in penalties, plus attorneys fees.

It violates the Stored Communications Act. The Stored Communications Act, Section 2703(c), provides exactly five exceptions that would permit a phone company to disclose to the government the list of calls to or from a subscriber: (i) a warrant; (ii) a court order; (iii) the customer’s consent; (iv) for telemarketing enforcement; or (v) by “administrative subpoena.” The first four clearly don’t apply. As for administrative subpoenas, where a government agency asks for records without court approval, there is a simple answer – the NSA has no administrative subpoena authority, and it is the NSA that reportedly got the phone records.

The penalty for violating the Stored Communications Act is $1000 per individual violation. Section 2707 of the Stored Communications Act gives a private right of action to any telephone customer “aggrieved by any violation.” If the phone company acted with a “knowing or intentional state of mind,” then the customer wins actual harm, attorney’s fees, and “in no case shall a person entitled to recover receive less than the sum of $1,000.”

(The telcos might say they didn’t “know” they were violating the law. But USA Today reports that Qwest’s lawyers knew about the legal risks, which are bright and clear in the statute book.)

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act doesn’t get the telcos off the hook. According to USA Today, the NSA did not go to the FISA court to get a court order. And Qwest is quoted as saying that the Attorney General would not certify that the request was lawful under FISA. So FISA provides no defense for the phone companies, either.

The phone companies at risk for at least $1,000 per person whose records they disclosed without a court order.

If you have a class action involving 10 million Americans, that’s 10 million times $1,000 — that’s 10 Billion.
View user's profile Send private message
kamnet
Vonage Forum Master
Vonage Forum Master


Joined: Sep 12, 2005
Posts: 229
Location: Mt. Sterling, KY

PostPosted: Mon May 15, 2006 9:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

blakadher wrote:

No laws were broken and the phone records were stripped of any individually identifiable data. Also, the phone companies were providing the data voluntarily. You guys are getting all excited about something that's not happening.


It doesn't matter if it was stripped of individually identifiable data or not. That is still *MY DATA*.

It's a shame that the companies were providing the data volluntairly. They lose my trust as a customer. But NSA still had no business asking for it. As I said, I guess I'm just silly for expecting that my government uphold the SPIRIT of the laws that they create. The law says that the government gets no data without a court order. That doesn't make it acceptable to just go poking around and see who will give it up voluntairly.
View user's profile Send private message
kamnet
Vonage Forum Master
Vonage Forum Master


Joined: Sep 12, 2005
Posts: 229
Location: Mt. Sterling, KY

PostPosted: Mon May 15, 2006 9:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

oz_80 wrote:
These telcos who turned over their customer phone records to NSA will be facing class action lawsuits.


The feds have already injected itself into three such lawsuits, asking the courts to squash them because they may involve items which pertain to "national secrets".
View user's profile Send private message
blakadher
Vonage Forum Evangelist
Vonage Forum Evangelist


Joined: Dec 23, 2005
Posts: 476
Location: Vancouver, WA

PostPosted: Mon May 15, 2006 10:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

oz_80 wrote:
Vonage wasn't asked for any customer info by NSA.

NSA only asked the traditional telcos.

Good to know however that in light of what happened Vonage has come out saying they won't give without court order.

These telcos who turned over their customer phone records to NSA will be facing class action lawsuits.

For every 1 million Americans whose records were turned over to NSA, the telcos could be liable for $1 billion in penalties, plus attorneys fees.

It violates the Stored Communications Act. The Stored Communications Act, Section 2703(c), provides exactly five exceptions that would permit a phone company to disclose to the government the list of calls to or from a subscriber: (i) a warrant; (ii) a court order; (iii) the customer’s consent; (iv) for telemarketing enforcement; or (v) by “administrative subpoena.” The first four clearly don’t apply. As for administrative subpoenas, where a government agency asks for records without court approval, there is a simple answer – the NSA has no administrative subpoena authority, and it is the NSA that reportedly got the phone records.

The penalty for violating the Stored Communications Act is $1000 per individual violation. Section 2707 of the Stored Communications Act gives a private right of action to any telephone customer “aggrieved by any violation.” If the phone company acted with a “knowing or intentional state of mind,” then the customer wins actual harm, attorney’s fees, and “in no case shall a person entitled to recover receive less than the sum of $1,000.”

(The telcos might say they didn’t “know” they were violating the law. But USA Today reports that Qwest’s lawyers knew about the legal risks, which are bright and clear in the statute book.)

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act doesn’t get the telcos off the hook. According to USA Today, the NSA did not go to the FISA court to get a court order. And Qwest is quoted as saying that the Attorney General would not certify that the request was lawful under FISA. So FISA provides no defense for the phone companies, either.

The phone companies at risk for at least $1,000 per person whose records they disclosed without a court order.

If you have a class action involving 10 million Americans, that’s 10 million times $1,000 — that’s 10 Billion.

Unfortunately (or perhaps fortunately for the telcos) all of that is moot because the information they gave the NSA did not contain any individually identifiable data and was therefore completely within the law. The information had been anonymized, as reported by USA Today (but that little tidbit is often ignored by the fear mongers).

_________________
Blakadher Legend
RTP300 behind a D-Link 614+ on Comcast
http://vonage.luthertech.com
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
oz_80
Vonage Forum Junior
Vonage Forum Junior


Joined: May 08, 2006
Posts: 32

PostPosted: Mon May 15, 2006 10:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

blakadher wrote:
Unfortunately (or perhaps fortunately for the telcos) all of that is moot because the information they gave the NSA did not contain any individually identifiable data and was therefore completely within the law. The information had been anonymized, as reported by USA Today (but that little tidbit is often ignored by the fear mongers).


Are you sure this is a fact ?

I know that's what they're saying "information being anonymized".

But I'm not so sure we have all the facts.

For 10 billion dollars, I don't think we'll have shortage of lawyers willing to take this on.
View user's profile Send private message
mbkerk
Full Forum Member
Full Forum Member


Joined: Jan 14, 2005
Posts: 63

PostPosted: Mon May 15, 2006 12:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

Normally I want as little government intervention in my life as possible, straight down the line, but when it comes to protecting me from terrorists and their ilk, I expect them to use every tool they have.

If they want to monitor who is calling who, thats just fine with me. If John Doe in the good ole USA is getting, or placing 30 calls a week to Achmed, (fictional known terrorist) in Pakistan... Dammit, I want someone to check into it and see what the hell they are talking about!

I struggle with this quote all the time...

Quote:
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security." - Ben Franklin


Mr. Franklin could not have imagined what we are facing today. I think, were he alive, he might adjust his thinking just a little bit!

Note to all you conspiracy theorist who think the government was behind 9-11... Censors would delete what I have to say to you! Why don't you turn up Art Bell or George Noory and get your fix on the Remote Viewers and the Aliens that are making regular visits to our planet. Maybe when you board the mother ship someday, you will be enlightened! Sorry you missed the last one when the Heavens Gate folks jumped on board. (I wonder if they somehow directed the planes into the buildings?)

To NavyDavy and all the others here who have served, and are serving our country... Thank you! Don't let these nut cases get you down! They are in the minority!

_________________
Mark

Midcontinent Cable
Linksys Cable Modem
Linksys RT31P2 Router
Linksys BEFW11S4 Wireless Router
Vonage member since 1-6-2005
View user's profile Send private message
blakadher
Vonage Forum Evangelist
Vonage Forum Evangelist


Joined: Dec 23, 2005
Posts: 476
Location: Vancouver, WA

PostPosted: Mon May 15, 2006 12:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

kamnet wrote:
It doesn't matter if it was stripped of individually identifiable data or not. That is still *MY DATA*.

It doesn't matter in your eyes, but in the eyes of the law it most certainly does matter.

kamnet wrote:
It's a shame that the companies were providing the data volluntairly. They lose my trust as a customer. But NSA still had no business asking for it. As I said, I guess I'm just silly for expecting that my government uphold the SPIRIT of the laws that they create. The law says that the government gets no data without a court order. That doesn't make it acceptable to just go poking around and see who will give it up voluntairly.

The Telecommunications Act of 1934 (amended) prohibits the release of individually identifiable information unless obtained by warrant. The Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 explicitly permits telecommunications companies to provide customer records to the government if the government asks for them. You'll notice both of those are pre-9/11 and in keeping with the spirit of the laws. Not to mention it is the Supreme Court's purview to ensure that the Executive branch is in keeping with the spirit of the law. All of the checks and balances of our government are set up the way they are for a reason.

_________________
Blakadher Legend
RTP300 behind a D-Link 614+ on Comcast
http://vonage.luthertech.com
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
kamnet
Vonage Forum Master
Vonage Forum Master


Joined: Sep 12, 2005
Posts: 229
Location: Mt. Sterling, KY

PostPosted: Mon May 15, 2006 1:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top

mbkerk wrote:
Normally I want as little government intervention in my life as possible, straight down the line, but when it comes to protecting me from terrorists and their ilk, I expect them to use every tool they have.

If they want to monitor who is calling who, thats just fine with me. If John Doe in the good ole USA is getting, or placing 30 calls a week to Achmed, (fictional known terrorist) in Pakistan... Dammit, I want someone to check into it and see what the hell they are talking about!


And if the government has information from outside these telephone logs that John Doe and Achmed are talking a lot, and they have other evidence which suggests that one or the other may be involved in terrorism, then it is VERY EASY for them to take this information and obtain a wiretap for further investigation.

But just because John and Achmed call each other all the time, that's not proof that they are terrorist. That's only proof that a) they like to talk a lot and b) they've got the money to spend on international calls. Neither one is a crime.

Quote:
I struggle with this quote all the time...

Quote:
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security." - Ben Franklin


Mr. Franklin could not have imagined what we are facing today. I think, were he alive, he might adjust his thinking just a little bit!



I think you forget that Mr. Franklin was quite alive before, during and after the American Revolutionary War. He lived in a time and age not of terrorist attacks, but when the enemy embedded their own troops RIGHT IN OUR HOMES and demanded that we feed, clothe and shelter them. No secret or any sort of private information of any kind could be kept reasonably kept because there were the eyes and ears of the British government around all the time.

The security was there, but few individuals I'm sure felt very secure when it's living off of your family like a parasite. I'm quite sure that part of the inspiration for this quite came from this. I'm also sure that a large part of the inspiration of this quote came from the fact that too many individuals are too apathetic to what the government is or is not doing.
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


All times are GMT - 5 Hours

Vonage Service Plans


Vonage VoIP Members
Members List Members
New wendyai2
New Today 5
Yesterday 7
Total 99021

Who Is On Site
Visitors 93
Members 0
Total 93


Vonage VoIP Forum Members:
Login Here
Not a Member? You can Register Here
As a registered member you will have access to the VoIP Speed Test, Vonage Service Announcements and post comments in the
Vonage VoIP Forums

Vonage Stock Price
Value: 6.74
Change:   N/A
Up to 15 Minute Delay

Site Search
 






†AK and HI residents pay $29.95 shipping. ††Limited time offer. Valid for residents of the United States (&DC), 18 years or older, who open new accounts. Offer good while supplies last and only on new account activations. One kit per account/household. Offer cannot be combined with any other discounts, promotions or plans and is not applicable to past purchases. Good while supplies last. Allow up to 2 weeks for shipping. Other restrictions may apply.

1Unlimited calling and other services for all residential plans are based on normal residential, personal, non-commercial use. A combination of factors is used to determine abnormal use, including but not limited to: the number of unique numbers called, calls forwarded, minutes used and other factors. Subject to our Reasonable Use Policy and Terms of Service.

2Shipping and activation fees waived with 1-year agreement. An Early Termination Fee (with periodic pro-rated reductions) applies if service is terminated before the end of the first 12 months. Additional restrictions may apply. See Terms of Service for details.

HIGH SPEED INTERNET REQUIRED. †VALID FOR NEW LINES ONLY. RATES EXCLUDE INTERNET SERVICE, SURCHARGES, FEES AND TAXES. DEVICE MAY BE REFURBISHED. If you subscribe to plans with monthly minutes allotments, all call minutes placed from both from your home and registered ExtensionsTM phones will count toward your monthly minutes allotment. ExtensionsTM calls made from mobiles use airtime and may incur surcharges, depending on your mobile plan. Alarms, TTY and other systems may not be compatible. Vonage 911 service operates differently than traditional 911. See www.vonage.com/911 for details.

** Certain call types excluded.

www.vonage-forum.com is not an official Vonage support website & is independently operated.
All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owners. All comments are property of their posters.
All other www.vonage-forum.com content is © Copyright 2002 - 2013 by 4Sight Media LLC.

Thinking of signing up for Vonage but have questions?
Business and Residential customers can call Toll Free 24 hours a day at: 1-888-692-8074
No Vonage Promotion Code or Coupon Codes are required at www.vonage.com to receive any special,
best Vonage cheap deals, free sign up offers or discounts.

[ | | | | | ]

Vonage Forum Site Maps

Vonage | VoIP Forum | How VoIP Works | Wiring and Installation Page Two | International Rate Plans 2 | Internet Phone
Promotion | Vonage Review | VoIP | Broadband Phone | Free Month | Rebate | Vonnage | Vontage | VoIP | Phone Service
Phone | llamadas ilimitadas a Mexico | Latest News | VoIP Acronyms | Deal | Philippines Globe Phone | Site Maps

The Vonage Forum provides the Vonage sign up Best Offer Promotion Deal.
If you are considering signing up for Vonage and have found our Vonage News, Customer Reviews, Forums
& all other parts of this site useful, please use our Vonage Sign up page.


Vonage VoIP Phone Service is redefining communications by offering consumers
& small business VoIP Internet phones, an affordable alternative to traditional phone service.
The Vonage VoIP Forum Generated This Page In: 0.78 Seconds and 395 Pages In The Last 60 Seconds
The Vonage VoIP Forum