Sign up
Vonage Forum Menu
The Vonage Forums
Vonage VoIP Forum
Vonage Forum Archive
Vonage Canada
Vonage UK
Vonage Stock
Fax, Tivo & Alarms
Hard Wiring
Number Transfer
V-Phone & SoftPhone
VoIP Feature Request
Vonage TV Ads
International Rates
Forum Suggestions
Report a Bug
The Cafeteria
Forums Archive
All Vonage News
Vonage In The News
Press Releases
Forum Digest
News Archives
Vonage Sign Up Info
Vonage Features
Vonage Area Codes
Vonage FAQ
Vonage Reviews
VoIP Speed Test
Vonage Toolbar
Network Setup
Wiring & Installation
Vonage 911
Business Account
VoIP Acronyms
VoIP Advertising
Wi-Fi Phone
Contact Support
Member Registration
Member Login
Member List
Your Account
Private Message
Forum Faqs
Recommend Us
Website Feedback
Forum Syndication
Forum Newsletter
Search Using Google
Search Forums
Search News
Forum Speed Dial
Vonage Forum
Forum Community
The Vonage Forums
Vonage VoIP Forum
Forum Archive
Vonage Canada
Vonage UK
Vonage Stock
Fax, Tivo & Alarms
Hard Wiring
Number Transfer
V-Phone & SoftPhone
Feature Request
Vonage On TV
International Rates
Forum Suggestions
Report A Bug
The Cafeteria
All Archives
Vonage News
All Vonage News
In The News
Press Releases
Forum Digest
News Archive
Vonage Information
Sign Up Info
Vonage Features
Area Codes
Vonage FAQ
Vonage Reviews
VoIP Speed Test
Vonage Toolbar
Network Setup
Wiring & Installation
Vonage 911
Business Account
VoIP Acronyms
VoIP Advertising
Wi-Fi Phone
Contact Support
Member Services
Registration
Member Login
Member List
Your Account
Private Messages
Forum Faq's
Recommend Us
Website Feedback
RSS Syndication
Forum Newsletter
Search
Search Using Google
Search Forums
Search News
Vonage Forums
Numerous Vonage Customer Service and RTP300 Problems...
Vonage® VoIP Forum - Vonage News, Reviews And Discussion
»
Vonage Forum Archive
Author
Message
Frodo
New Forum Member
Joined: Apr 11, 2006
Posts: 4
Posted:
Tue Apr 11, 2006 2:08 pm
Post subject: Numerous Vonage Customer Service and RTP300 Problems...
To make a long story short, I switched to
Vonage
because my ISP was switching their
Voip
provider and the new provider was claiming that they couldn't port my existing numbers over. I have two
Voip
numbers (one home, one business) so I setup two separate accounts with
Vonage
so I could take one of the RTP300 boxes with me if I had to travel.
Now to the problems with
Vonage
:
1.
Vonage
screwed up the porting of my numbers. The process to port them started on January 19, 2006. The business number was finally transfered on March 14, 2006. The home number
Vonage
claims was transfered on March 31, 2006 -- but it really wasn't. After TEN DAYS of Vonage's LNP department claiming the number transfered and my proving to
Vonage
that it didn't,
Vonage
finally got to the bottom of the problem (they screwed up the transfer and Level3 snapped the transfer back.) During the process of trying to get this resolved, Vonage's system automatically dropped my virtual number that I was having my original service forwarded to, so I didn't have any phone calls for one day (which might not be a bad thing depending on your perspective.)
Vonage
has since given me a new virtual number and they have started the porting process of my home number ALL OVER AGAIN.
2. I cannot have both RTP300's on my network at the same time REGARDLESS of network configuration, and I have tried every possible configuration.
Vonage
has been useless with this. In addition, I am having numerous QoS issues with the RTP300's. There are times that I can be on the phone and try to go out to the web and then all hell breaks loose -- the browser hangs, the phone drops call packets in both directions -- and the ONLY solution is to power cycle the RTP300.
3. While trying to resolve #2 above, I discovered that the 1.00.6 version of the firmware had a bug in the QoS option. If you disabled QoS the setting would be re-enabled if you power cycled the router (therefore it was not retaining the setting after a power cycle.) I notified
Vonage
and I received a call from them on April 3, 2006 confirming the bug and that the issue was getting pushed up to the firmware development team. If, and that is a BIG IF, version 1.00.62 is supposed to resolve this problem, then version 1.00.62 is broken because this problem is still not resolved in version 1.00.62 based on my testing. The setting returns to enabled after a power cycle.
4. Based on all the problems that I have had, I have begged
Vonage
for ATA boxes and not routers --
Vonage
refuses to do this. These routers are junk. I'm sure I am in the minority of users with these problems, but if these routers can't exist in a normal, small business environment then they are useless.
5. These problems have existed since I received my equipment on January 24th. I have been talking to Vonage's "Executive Response Team, The Team That Directly Reports to the CEO" -- which is a bunch of marketing B.S. since they are no better at customer service than their normal off-shored idiots.
Based on my experiences with
Vonage
, unless
Vonage
"WOW'S" me with some customer service that actually resolves the issues above, I will be going back to land lines as soon as
Vonage
finishes the transfer of my home number, so I can have SBC transfer the numbers to them (my home number was originally an SBC number anyway.)
Thanks,
Frodo
NateHoy
Vonage Forum
MVM
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Posts: 2257
Location: New England
Posted:
Tue Apr 11, 2006 2:21 pm
Post subject:
The RTP300 is a good
Vonage
box, but as you have experienced, a barely adequate router. QoS on it is a joke, and a poor joke at that. Took me a long time to try and work around it on my WRTP54G (same as the RTP300 but with wireless), and I finally realized it just.. doesn't... work.
However, the good news - it is reportedly one of the best devices for
Vonage
voice quality.
Put a real, honest-to-god router in front of both RTP300's, and I think you'll find that the RTP300 does very well as a pure Vonage-only box. That's what I did with my WRTP54G and it's a great
Vonage
box. When I travel, I even use it as a casual-use router and it does fairly good as long as I don't need QoS or put super heavy traffic through it.
_________________
Comcast Cable (3m down / 256k up) -> Linksys BEFCMU10 v2 (DOCSIS 1.0) -> WRT54G v4 ("Tomato" firmware) -> the rest of my network including a WRTP54G (Firmware: 5.01.04)
My
Vonage
Self-Help Guides:
http://vonage.nmhoy.net
Frodo
New Forum Member
Joined: Apr 11, 2006
Posts: 4
Posted:
Tue Apr 11, 2006 2:57 pm
Post subject:
I have had the following configurations on my network:
1. BEFSR81 as the main router with the RTP300's plugged into ports 1 and 2 and then two EZXS88W switches, WRT54G, and other equipment plugged into ports 3 through 7. Complete instability with the RTP300's on the network.
2. WRT54G as the main router - the rest the same as #1 above. Same instability.
3. #1 above but with one RTP300 behind the other RTP300. Same instability.
4. #3 above but with the first RTP300 in the DMZ. Same instabililty. Also tried with the second RTP300 in the first RTP300's DMZ. Same instability.
5. #2 above but with one RTP300 behind the other RTP300. Same instability.
6. #5 above but with the first RTP300 in the DMZ. Same instabililty. Also tried with the second RTP300 in the first RTP300's DMZ. Same instability.
5. RTP300 as the main router with second RTP300 in DMZ of main RTP300. Same instability.
6. RTP300 as the main router and second RTP300 removed from network. Instability, but not as severe with both devices on the network. Frequent power cycles still necessary to resolve instability issues.
Without the RTP300's on the network:
1. BEFSR81 as main router - no instability.
Voip
calls perfect with Sipura ATA from original
Voip
.
2. WRT54G as main router - no instability.
Voip
calls perfect with Sipura ATA from original
Voip
.
So... even with the RTP300's connected as just voice adapters, they still cause instability on my network.
BTW... TestYourVoiP.com reports an overall rating of 4.0 when I tested it.
What router do you have as your main router for your network?
taylor2767
Vonage Forum Evangelist
Joined: May 05, 2005
Posts: 400
Posted:
Tue Apr 11, 2006 3:10 pm
Post subject:
Have you tried disabling your main routers firewall? My experience with
Vonage
TA is that they will cause your setup to go whacko. If you haven't the disable your main routers firewall and the DMZ and keep this router first in your connection after your modem. You should see more stability.
Frodo
New Forum Member
Joined: Apr 11, 2006
Posts: 4
Posted:
Tue Apr 11, 2006 3:23 pm
Post subject:
When the WRT54G (hardware version 2) router was the main router, I had Firewall Protection disabled. I also had a hardware version 5 of the WRT54G, but you cannot disable the SPI firewall in that router -- this was confirmed with a call to Linksys (so basically the hardware version 5 of the WRT54G was worthless and went back to the store.)
Unfortunately, the setting on the RTP300 to turn off the firewall also controls NAT.
mcouture
Vonage Forum Associate
Joined: Aug 09, 2005
Posts: 21
Posted:
Thu Apr 13, 2006 12:11 pm
Post subject:
I am using a Linksys WRT54G as my main router, then I have a RTP300 on port 1, a RTP300 on port 2, a hub on port 3 and a hub on port 4.
I have had no problems with either of the RTP300s, and I have a total of 3 lines running.
I run DD-WRT v23 firmware on the WRT54G and I can monitor just about anything via SNMP on that router....
Frodo
New Forum Member
Joined: Apr 11, 2006
Posts: 4
Posted:
Thu Apr 13, 2006 12:52 pm
Post subject:
Pardon my ignorance, I did check out dd-wrt.org, but what are the benefits of using this firmware opposed to the firmware that Linksys produces? Does it support
Voip
better? Are there other enhancements that I can take advantage of? The documentation on the site isn't very good.
mcouture
Vonage Forum Associate
Joined: Aug 09, 2005
Posts: 21
Posted:
Thu Apr 13, 2006 1:11 pm
Post subject:
Many more available features than the stock Linksys firmware.
Much better support for QoS...I give SIP protocol the highest priority.
Many other services available to run like SNMP for performance monitoring.
dd-wrt Documentation
I run their "standard" firmware and it works wonderfully.
Backglass
Vonage Forum Associate
Joined: Apr 01, 2006
Posts: 18
Posted:
Thu Apr 13, 2006 2:24 pm
Post subject:
I am torn between Sveasoft, DD--wrt and Hyper-wrt.
Anybody try all three and determine which is best for
Voip
?
NateHoy
Vonage Forum
MVM
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Posts: 2257
Location: New England
Posted:
Thu Apr 13, 2006 2:41 pm
Post subject:
I know HyperWRT works very well (I've been using it for a long time with Vonage), and I'm sure (from reports others have made) that DD-WRT is also excellent.
I have no experience with Sveasoft myself, but from what I understand it is no better than HyperWRT or DD-WRT, some even say worse, but that is just what I have read on other forums. Sveasoft also costs money.
Of course, if you use HyperWRT or DD-WRT, please do send the author a few bucks.
The basic choice between HyperWRT and DD-WRT is:
HyperWRT: Written as an "overlay" or "mod" to the stock firmware (though, of course, it is compiled as a complete package), upgraded with new stock firmware as Linksys releases new versions, designed to be as close as possible to stock firmware while adding features. The screens look very much like the original firmware, with lots more options. Current version:
http://www.thibor.co.uk/
Example: screenshots of HyperWRT QoS screen (as part of a tutorial I wrote up on configuring HyperWRT for
Vonage
:
http://vonage.nmhoy.net/wrt54glqos.html
DD-WRT: Took stock firmware and basically "started fresh", adding huge swaths of features Linksys never intended. Some VERY cool stuff there if you need advanced features.
From the feedback I have seen, DD-WRT is more complex to manage (but, with that many features, well DUH! (grin)) but really, really unlocks your router if you need very advanced features.
Speed reports are a toss up. The router is a 200MHz processor Linux machine, so it's going to top out at about 15MBps on the WAN link no matter what you do. I don't think anyone has any serious benchmarks proving that DD-WRT or HyperWRT Thibor (the current version) are slower or faster relative to the other. Both are fast.
Personally, I went HyperWRT because I have little need of the super-advanced features of DD-WRT, and HyperWRT added what I needed. I also use it because it appears to be simpler to manage, and that is important when I recommend and support something to relative network newbies at forums like this one. But, I don't think you can go wrong either way.
_________________
Comcast Cable (3m down / 256k up) -> Linksys BEFCMU10 v2 (DOCSIS 1.0) -> WRT54G v4 ("Tomato" firmware) -> the rest of my network including a WRTP54G (Firmware: 5.01.04)
My
Vonage
Self-Help Guides:
http://vonage.nmhoy.net
Display posts from previous:
All Posts
1 Day
7 Days
2 Weeks
1 Month
3 Months
6 Months
1 Year
Oldest First
Newest First
Vonage® VoIP Forum - Vonage News, Reviews And Discussion
»
Vonage Forum Archive
Jump to:
Select a forum
Vonage® VoIP Forums
----------------
Vonage
Vonage Forum Archive
Vonage Canada
Vonage UK
Vonage Stock
Fax - Tivo - Alarms
Hard Wiring - Installation
LNP – Local Number Portability
Vonage V-Phone & SoftPhone
VoIP Feature Wish List
Vonage TV Commercials
International Rates
Forum Suggestions - Open Topics
----------------
The Cafeteria - Any Non Vonage Topic
Forum Suggestions - Comments
Report A Forum Bug
You
cannot
post new topics in this forum
You
cannot
reply to topics in this forum
You
cannot
edit your posts in this forum
You
cannot
delete your posts in this forum
You
cannot
vote in polls in this forum
All times are GMT - 5 Hours