Search found 110 matches

Wow... alot of anti-union vitriol. I expect much of it is misplaced.

I agree that many unions are anti-competitive and handcuff companies from pursuing the best growth policies that they can these ...

Stan... you also still haven't tried doing a wired test.

Even though you are using 802.11g standard for your wireless internet, that doesn't mean you are getting anywhere close to it's theoretica ...

I can't help but gloat... I've been running 9.6Mb up / 1Mb down for about 5 years now with Cablevision.

With speeds like that, discussions about router based QOS are as quaint to me as "browser acc ...

Losing calls after a minute like that may be fixed by setting up port forwarding on your router. In theory this should not be necessary on any router that supports UPnP. However, implementation of U ...

....but a max of 300k upstream between them all..

Even a 300kpbs upstream cap should be sufficient for Vonage.

Don't despair... at least with the eight port router you'll have less clutter, and since these LInksys boxes are ubiquitous, we'll all know what your setup pages look like if you have an issue in the ...

I've never seen a DHCP server that makes you actually put in the specific IP addresses it may serve. It's always a range, typically defined as x # of addresses beginning with aaa, or any address betw ...

VOIP over WIFI (especially someone else's WIFI! Smile

) would be really cool. Yep. Really cool. Useful? Not so much. But really cool.

Why not so useful? Most of us already have cell phone and to ...

OK... Let's get this back OT and help Ivan out. We know you don't need QOS and generally we don't want to put anything in any DMZ if it can be avoided.

So let's get back to this "firmware allo ...

Ivan... I too have Optimum Online. Everyone is correct.. you have plenty of bandwidth to handle Vonage calls without resorting to any type of bandwidth management.

This means that you can and sh ...