Sign up

Vonage Forum Menu

Vonage Forums
Vonage VoIP Forum
HildBeft Posted:
You can recollect
password by
connecting the
router to your pc
and open the

In The Forum:
Hard Wiring - Installation
How to arrive at wifi password?
On Oct 20, 2016 at 05:05:49

HildBeft Posted:
Great tips..
Thanks for sharing

In The Forum:
Hard Wiring - Installation
How to have Vonage and another land line?
On Oct 20, 2016 at 04:55:03

massrman Posted:
The devices are
available at
different price
margins , please
share your

In The Forum:
IP PBX for small business
On Sep 30, 2016 at 00:48:03

massrman Posted:
Hi these are most
commonly used SIP
PBX interops and

In The Forum:
IP PBX for small business
On Sep 30, 2016 at 00:37:45

Sammy00 Posted:
Has anyone setup a
W52p phone for
vonage? I have
a W52p with two
wireless handsets,

In The Forum:
Hard Wiring - Installation
W52p Setup
On Aug 30, 2016 at 10:38:01

James44 Posted:
Hi, I am
looking for a good
Sip Trunking
provider in
Canada. they
should offer

In The Forum:
A good sip trunking provider
On Jul 17, 2016 at 23:42:46

James44 Posted:
Which network
connection do you

In The Forum:
Wireless Access Point plugged into switch
On Jul 13, 2016 at 22:55:00

jjatsk Posted:
We are renting a
few offices right
next door to our
main building. I
have a wireless

In The Forum:
Wireless Access Point plugged into switch
On Jul 09, 2016 at 12:00:54

Pman Posted:
Hello, While
Vonage has been a
great service over
the years, it is
time to part

In The Forum:
LNP – Local Number Portability
Cannot port phone number to new carrier - repeated failures
On Jul 05, 2016 at 09:12:07

jbugz67 Posted:
We recently
purchased 5
Polycom VVX 300
phones from
Vonage, and have

In The Forum:
Nothing but problems with VVX300
On Apr 15, 2016 at 14:58:07

Vonage VoIP Forums

Vonage In The News
Vonage Holdings Corp. Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2013 Results

Carolyn Katz Elected to Board of Directors of Vonage Holdings Corp.


Vonage Customer Reviews
Vonage vs. Time Warner Cable SoCal
Vonage vs. Time Warner Cable SoCal

Vonage UK Review
Vonage UK Review

Vonage Pros and Cons for 2006
Vonage Pros and Cons for 2006

Vonage, a VT2142 and a RTP300, My Experiences - A Detailed Review
Vonage, a VT2142 and a RTP300, My Experiences - A Detailed Review

Salt Lake City: impressions after several months
Salt Lake City: impressions after several months

Vonage Reviews

A New Kind Of State's Rights

Vonage In Print News

A New Kind Of State's Rights

June 21, 2004

By Donny Jackson

For more than a century, most telecom regulation has come from the states. That changed somewhat with the passage of the 1996 Telecommunications Act, which granted the FCC greater powers.

Still, states continued to play a key role in the voice-calling arena, particularly after the FCC released its Triennial Review Order last year. Key components of the TRO called for state commissions to oversee detailed studies of the telecom marketplace and determine where CLECs were impaired. The aggressive, nine-month timeline created mountains of work for state commission staff members, but the TRO represented a high watermark for state commissions' authority.

It was short-lived. Today, state commissions' future role in regulating real-time voice calling is in doubt, and even its present role is in limbo.

The future is in doubt because most believe voice over IP is the future of voice calling. For states, that's a problem, because the distributive networks used to carry Voip calls cross state boundaries.

With this in mind, most FCC commissioners have indicated they believe Voip is inherently interstate, meaning it falls within the jurisdiction of the FCC, not the state commissions — a sentiment echoed in two Voip bills pending in Congress. Meanwhile, most carriers have told the FCC they do not want states to have any economic regulatory authority over VoIP.

Questions about the present revolve around the March decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit that ruled the FCC erred by delegating states so much authority in the TRO. Meanwhile, some even are beginning to argue that intermodal competition from wireless, cable and other alternatives has grown so much that all voice regulation has outlived its usefulness (see story on page 64).

Realistically, however, the battle is not about complete deregulation but whether states should be able to regulate Voip and whether sufficient grounds exist for pre-empting states from their traditional role in regulating legacy telephony networks.

“The U.S. is unusual, because it's one of the few jurisdictions in the world that has significant bifurcated regulation,” Parsons said. “I tend to believe in states' rights, but telecom policy probably is much better set at a national level rather than by 50 states.”

Most industry officials refer to Voip as a breakthrough that changes everything in telecom by making many key notions of traditional telephony networks obsolete. Most notably, concepts of time (minutes used) and distance (local, intrastate and interstate) don't matter in an IP world, they say.

Furthermore, IP calls travel over distributed networks, meaning even a call to a next-door neighbor theoretically can be routed through a server in a different country, not to mention a different state. With this in mind, Voip calls should be treated as interstate communications, making them the jurisdiction for the FCC, most members of the FCC have said.

For Voip providers, the implications are significant. Technologically, Voip allows providers to become nationwide players with relatively little time and money compared to their circuit-switched counterparts.

Hiring lawyers and government lobbyists is a necessary evil in most industries, but establishing a single federal office — even an expensive one — in Washington, D.C., is not nearly as costly and cumbersome as trying to staff and house offices in all 50 states, plus the nation's capital.

“You don't want to deal with 50 regulatory bodies,” said telecom analyst Andy Regitsky, president of Regitsky & Associates. “It's hard to keep that many chiefs happy.”

This barrier to entry caused by state regulation is only exacerbated in the marketplace, which is wary of any company subject to the whims of 50 state commissions, according to Vonage CEO Jeffrey Citron. After winning a court battle that prevented the state of Minnesota from treating it like a telecom carrier, Citron said Vonage quickly received $35 million in investment capital that allowed the company to expand quickly and become the poster child for independent Voip providers.

But Citron said the investment spigot probably turned off for Voip start-ups last month, when the state of New York classified Vonage as a telecom company that is required to meet the E911 standards of traditional telephony providers.

“So what happens?” Citron told the Association of the Bar of the City of New York last month. “All the capital that's going to voice-over-IP? Done. No more. No single investor in their right mind will deploy any capital — none, not one dollar — to a start-up company going after voice over IP.”

And it's not just smaller players that fear the regulatory scheme currently imposed on telecom carriers. Comcast CEO Brian Roberts recently testified before the Senate that the 1996 Telecom Act's deregulation of cable operators' network upgrades was the driving force for $85 billion in investment by the cable industry.

In addition, he acknowledged that one of his priorities for this year was getting the Supreme Court to consider overturning an appeals-court decision that cable-modem services include a telecom component.

With this in mind, Sen. John Sununu, R-N.H., has introduced legislation that would prohibit state and local governments from regulating or taxing Voip applications. While the bill is gathering a general base of support, arguably the staunchest opposition comes from the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, which represents most state regulators.

“This bill pre-empts state regulation,” Sununu said. “I don't imagine the association representing state regulators could ever embrace legislation that did that.”

Indeed, a 12-page comment in the FCC's IP-services proceeding penned by NARUC general counsel Brad Ramsay defends state commissions' regulatory role in Voip based primarily on a fundamental premise: Voip is not a revolutionary new service but the merely the latest advancement in a long tradition of real-time voice calling.

“The public telephone network has constantly evolved since the first phone was put into service over 100 years ago,” the NARUC filing states. “Digital switches and fiber rings are profoundly different than cord boards and a single strand of copper, but the core service used by customers remains fundamentally the same. New methods of delivering telephone service do not alter the fact that service must continue to be reliable and affordable.”

Furthermore, treating Voip calls differently than legacy circuit-switched calls would violate the FCC's goal of maintaining regulatory parity between functionally equivalent services, according to NARUC. It's a similar argument to that used by the state of Minnesota in appealing last year's court loss to Vonage.

“Vonage provides nothing more than a new technology requiring protocol conversion to maintain compatibility with a customer's existing CPE, and it facilitates the networking of an otherwise ordinary telecommunications service,” the Minnesota brief stated. “From the end users' standpoint, there is no net change in the form or content of the telecommunications they receive; any protocol conversion is transparent.”

At least one pro-state official requesting anonymity said, “The FCC has the edge here” if it decided to pre-empt state regulators.

Andy Lipman, a telecommunications attorney with the law firm of Swidler Berlin Shereff Friedman, agreed.
“While I'm certain the states would challenge [pre-emption], I think the FCC would prevail,” Lipman said.

But does the FCC want to stir the potential hornets' nest that would result from pre-empting state commissions? The fact that the FCC did not make a case for pre-emption in its order denying AT&T's declaratory petition exemption from access charges on phone-to-phone calls that use IP in transit is a sign that this is not a confrontation FCC commissioners are eager to start.

“There are snakes in the weeds here carrying poison [referring to the states], and the FCC still has its shin guards on,” said a source close to the situation, who requested anonymity.

But many still contend the state commissions can be more of a hindrance than an asset as the industry tries to resolve long-standing problems regarding UNEs and intercarrier compensation. Some argue Congress should clarify the matter by amending the Telecom Act in a way that grants the FCC clear pre-emption authority in appropriate areas. But it seems unlikely in the near future, because Congress faces more political pressure than the FCC.

“That's always been the biggest problem with bill and keep — the politics of it,” Regitsky said. “Do you want to take on the state commissions? Do you want to let them make arguments that pre-empting them and going to a bill-and-keep system will increase local rates — especially in an election year?”

Legg Mason telecom analyst Blair Levin said such questions are so perplexing that the FCC or Congress taking action to exclude states from regulating Voip is far from certain.
“I don't think it's a given,” Levin said. “States will end up with some role. What you saw California do with wireless [in terms of consumer protection] could happen with VoIP.”

Vonage Service Plans

Vonage VoIP Members
Members List Members
New MauraKnowl
New Today 3
Yesterday 2
Total 98682

Who Is On Site
Visitors 129
Members 1
Total 130

Vonage VoIP Forum Members:
Login Here
Not a Member? You can Register Here
As a registered member you will have access to the VoIP Speed Test, Vonage Service Announcements and post comments in the
Vonage VoIP Forums

Vonage Stock Price
Value: 6.26
Change:   N/A
Up to 15 Minute Delay

Site Search

Social Bookmarks
 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

†AK and HI residents pay $29.95 shipping. ††Limited time offer. Valid for residents of the United States (&DC), 18 years or older, who open new accounts. Offer good while supplies last and only on new account activations. One kit per account/household. Offer cannot be combined with any other discounts, promotions or plans and is not applicable to past purchases. Good while supplies last. Allow up to 2 weeks for shipping. Other restrictions may apply.

1Unlimited calling and other services for all residential plans are based on normal residential, personal, non-commercial use. A combination of factors is used to determine abnormal use, including but not limited to: the number of unique numbers called, calls forwarded, minutes used and other factors. Subject to our Reasonable Use Policy and Terms of Service.

2Shipping and activation fees waived with 1-year agreement. An Early Termination Fee (with periodic pro-rated reductions) applies if service is terminated before the end of the first 12 months. Additional restrictions may apply. See Terms of Service for details.

HIGH SPEED INTERNET REQUIRED. †VALID FOR NEW LINES ONLY. RATES EXCLUDE INTERNET SERVICE, SURCHARGES, FEES AND TAXES. DEVICE MAY BE REFURBISHED. If you subscribe to plans with monthly minutes allotments, all call minutes placed from both from your home and registered ExtensionsTM phones will count toward your monthly minutes allotment. ExtensionsTM calls made from mobiles use airtime and may incur surcharges, depending on your mobile plan. Alarms, TTY and other systems may not be compatible. Vonage 911 service operates differently than traditional 911. See for details.

** Certain call types excluded. is not an official Vonage support website & is independently operated.
All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owners. All comments are property of their posters.
All other content is © Copyright 2002 - 2013 by 4Sight Media LLC.

Thinking of signing up for Vonage but have questions?
Business and Residential customers can call Toll Free 24 hours a day at: 1-888-692-8074
No Vonage Promotion Code or Coupon Codes are required at to receive any special,
best Vonage cheap deals, free sign up offers or discounts.

[ | | | | | ]

Vonage Forum Site Maps

Vonage | VoIP Forum | How VoIP Works | Wiring and Installation Page Two | International Rate Plans 2 | Internet Phone
Promotion | Vonage Review | VoIP | Broadband Phone | Free Month | Rebate | Vonnage | Vontage | VoIP | Phone Service
Phone | llamadas ilimitadas a Mexico | Latest News | VoIP Acronyms | Deal | Philippines Globe Phone | Site Maps

The Vonage Forum provides the Vonage sign up Best Offer Promotion Deal.
If you are considering signing up for Vonage and have found our Vonage News, Customer Reviews, Forums
& all other parts of this site useful, please use our Vonage Sign up page.

Vonage VoIP Phone Service is redefining communications by offering consumers
& small business VoIP Internet phones, an affordable alternative to traditional phone service.
The Vonage VoIP Forum Generated This Page In: 0.90 Seconds and 415 Pages In The Last 60 Seconds
The Vonage VoIP Forum