Sign up

Vonage Forum Menu

Vonage Forums
Vonage VoIP Forum
Tomekaxali Posted:
Czy wiesz, co to
jest druk
banerowy? Jest to
rodzaj nadruku

In The Forum:
Rollupy reklamowe na czas u nas
On Apr 23, 2017 at 09:03:53

xing33 Posted:
In The Forum:
Vonage UK
On Apr 22, 2017 at 12:49:38

xing33 Posted:
In The Forum:
Vonage Canada
On Apr 22, 2017 at 12:45:21

diazou Posted:
Hello, It's
compatible with
Android your phone
? Thanks!

In The Forum:
IP PBX for small business
On Mar 28, 2017 at 07:42:33

jeddaisg Posted:
Hi all We have
a Vonage VOIP
system for our
office. Lately,
our call quality

In The Forum:
Ethernet Cable; Wiring schematic? 568-B?
On Feb 23, 2017 at 12:33:52

beast321 Posted:
I don't know if
you heard, that
many more
Dreamcast games
are opened up

In The Forum:
Fax - Tivo - Alarms
Using phone as a dial up modem for Dreamcast Gaming
On Feb 15, 2017 at 21:16:51

Av8rix Posted:
In The Forum:
New adapter and router -- MAC change
On Jan 10, 2017 at 19:07:21

tplink Posted:
Im trying to add
my HT802 vonage
adapter to my home
network. I
currently have

In The Forum:
Hard Wiring - Installation
Vonage behind switch
On Dec 05, 2016 at 06:35:11

DWSupport Posted:
After recent
Vonage update that
took place on the
4th and 5th of
Nov. E-mails with

In The Forum:
Voicemail Not Forwarding to Outlook Accounts
On Nov 10, 2016 at 12:23:26

peterlee Posted:
Had a call from a
Hospital in Ajax,
Ontario to my home
Scarborough, Onta

In The Forum:
Vonage Canada
Hospital Incoming call unable to connect
On Nov 08, 2016 at 11:59:50

Vonage VoIP Forums

Vonage In The News
Vonage Holdings Corp. Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2013 Results

Carolyn Katz Elected to Board of Directors of Vonage Holdings Corp.


Vonage Customer Reviews
Vonage vs. Time Warner Cable SoCal
Vonage vs. Time Warner Cable SoCal

Vonage UK Review
Vonage UK Review

Vonage Pros and Cons for 2006
Vonage Pros and Cons for 2006

Vonage, a VT2142 and a RTP300, My Experiences - A Detailed Review
Vonage, a VT2142 and a RTP300, My Experiences - A Detailed Review

Salt Lake City: impressions after several months
Salt Lake City: impressions after several months

Vonage Reviews

The Month In Brief "FCC to Address Two Extremes in the VOIP Controversy, Leaving

Vonage In Print News

February 3, 2004

By Staff

The New Year already has brought a number of developments that cut across all industry segments. Perhaps the most consequential of these is the apparent decision of the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC" or "Commission") to clarify the regulatory status of Voice over Internet Protocol ("VOIP") service. VOIP, which for years has sheltered comfortably under the Commission's reluctance to "regulate the Internet," may become subject to new burdens and obligations that will help to shape the future direction of the Internet and traditional telecommunications service.

FCC to Address Two Extremes in the Voip Controversy, Leaving the Uncertainty in the Middle

For many years, the Commission has avoided deciding whether voice services that use the Internet protocol will pay access charges, contribute to the universal service fund and shoulder other burdens that are imposed on traditional voice telephone companies. The Commission's official position is still the one it took in 1998, when it stated in a Report to Congress that phone-to-phone Voip probably is a telecommunications service subject to common carrier regulation, but computer-to-computer, computer-to-phone, and phone-to-computer variants likely are unregulated enhanced/information services.. Except for these tentative observations, the 1998 Report reached no conclusions and imposed no obligations on Voip providers. Since then, the variety and prominence of Voip services have grown along with the pressure on the FCC to revisit the Voip issue. The issue has been given new life by recent requests from AT&T and for rulings on the regulatory status of their Voip offerings, and by persistent suggestions that this year will bring a Voip rulemaking proceeding.

FCC and industry officials now say that the Commission will reject AT&T's petition, which requests that it not be liable to the regional Bell operating companies ("RBOCs") for millions of dollars in access charges where AT&T uses the Internet (rather than the public switched telephone network) to carry long-distance calls between conventional telephones. FCC Chairman Michael Powell announced his intention to have the Commission act on the AT&T petition before the Commission's February 12, 2004 meeting.

The AT&T petition, and a flurry of lobbying on both sides of the voice-over-IP issue, prompted the FCC to invite AT&T to the Commission to meet with the agency's staff and participate in a courtroom-like debate. AT&T argued that its Voip service should continue to pay only the same business line rates paid to local telephone companies by Internet servcie providers. SBC Communications, speaking for the RBOC position, argued that AT&T and other Voip providers should be required to pay the access charges imposed on long-distance carriers, and claimed that AT&T is engaging in "regulatory arbitrage" by using the Internet to evade the usual regulatory obligations of long-distance telephone companies.

The FCC's rejection of AT&T's position is expected to be based on the fact that AT&T's Voip calls originate and terminate at a conventional telephone on the public switched telephone network ("PSTN").

AT&T's voice-over-IP service often commences with a traditional call from a phone, which is converted by AT&T into digital packets carried over AT&T's Internet backbone. Before the call is delivered to the called party, the digital packets are converted back to a conventional PSTN format for delivery to a conventional telephone. The Commission is expected to find that such phone-to-phone telephony does not fall within the category of "enhanced or information services" that the Commission has exempted from payment of access charges.

Although the Commission is expected to reject AT&T's request, it is believed that the Commission will uphold the request of The service does not use phone numbers or the traditional phone network at all.

Rather, its service uses specialized equipment that communicates over broadband Internet connections. Because the calls are not phone-to-phone services that originate and terminate on the PSTN, the Commission is expected to grant's request for relief from regulation.

The Commission's expected actions on the AT&T and requests will leave many questions unanswered. Other participants in the voice-over-IP space will face continued uncertainty unless their applications mirror either the AT&T and Internet phone applications.

It is anticipated, however, that the FCC will initiate a rulemaking proceeding this year that will comprehensively address the regulatory status of the principal variants of VOIP. That rulemaking likely will go beyond the access charge issue to address the possible obligations of different types of Voip providers to contribute to universal service funds, support E-911 emergency services and comply with the Communications Assistance to Law Enforcement Act ("CALEA").

At the state level, many states are uncertain as to how much authority they have to regulate voice-over-IP services and Voip providers. Both the California PUC and the Colorado PUC have decided that they will not address Voip regulation until the FCC rules on the extent to which the states have jurisdiction to do so. In light of the expectation that the FCC soon will rule on the regulatory status of VOIP, neither the Colorado nor the California PUCs believe that it makes sense for the new Internet technology to be subject to fifty-one (51) utility commission "imposing idiosyncratic, inconsistent and costly obligations."

However, the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (WUTC) has scheduled open hearings on May 5, 2004 to determine whether voice-over-IP providers owe intrastate access charges. The particular case involves the WUTC's complaint against LocalDial, a Voip service provider, and the WUTC is solely focused on the issue of whether such a Voip provider is liable for access charges for using the equipment and facilities of telephone companies for the origination or completion of intrastate interexchange calls.

Finally, in Minnesota, the U.S. District Court denied various motions that followed its October 16, 2003 ruling in the Vonage v. Minn. PUC case, which declared Vonage's voice-over-IP communications service to be an unregulated information service and entirely outside of the Minnesota PUC's jurisdiction. Specifically, the Minnesota PUC filed a motion for amended filings or a new trial, and Qwest Communications, the RBOC serving Minnesota, filed a motion to intervene and amend judgment. The U.S. District Court ruled that its prior conclusions were not altered by the PUC's assertion that 97% of the Vonage calls come into contact with the PSTN. The U.S. District Court's decision was primarily based upon its determination that Vonage's services are "information services" and that Congress had pre-empted state regulation of any and all aspects of information services.

Vonage Service Plans

Vonage VoIP Members
Members List Members
New fannygz4
New Today 2
Yesterday 4
Total 100333

Who Is On Site
Visitors 160
Members 0
Total 160

Vonage VoIP Forum Members:
Login Here
Not a Member? You can Register Here
As a registered member you will have access to the VoIP Speed Test, Vonage Service Announcements and post comments in the
Vonage VoIP Forums

Vonage Stock Price
Value: 6.41
Change:   N/A
Up to 15 Minute Delay

Site Search

Social Bookmarks
 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

†AK and HI residents pay $29.95 shipping. ††Limited time offer. Valid for residents of the United States (&DC), 18 years or older, who open new accounts. Offer good while supplies last and only on new account activations. One kit per account/household. Offer cannot be combined with any other discounts, promotions or plans and is not applicable to past purchases. Good while supplies last. Allow up to 2 weeks for shipping. Other restrictions may apply.

1Unlimited calling and other services for all residential plans are based on normal residential, personal, non-commercial use. A combination of factors is used to determine abnormal use, including but not limited to: the number of unique numbers called, calls forwarded, minutes used and other factors. Subject to our Reasonable Use Policy and Terms of Service.

2Shipping and activation fees waived with 1-year agreement. An Early Termination Fee (with periodic pro-rated reductions) applies if service is terminated before the end of the first 12 months. Additional restrictions may apply. See Terms of Service for details.

HIGH SPEED INTERNET REQUIRED. †VALID FOR NEW LINES ONLY. RATES EXCLUDE INTERNET SERVICE, SURCHARGES, FEES AND TAXES. DEVICE MAY BE REFURBISHED. If you subscribe to plans with monthly minutes allotments, all call minutes placed from both from your home and registered ExtensionsTM phones will count toward your monthly minutes allotment. ExtensionsTM calls made from mobiles use airtime and may incur surcharges, depending on your mobile plan. Alarms, TTY and other systems may not be compatible. Vonage 911 service operates differently than traditional 911. See for details.

** Certain call types excluded. is not an official Vonage support website & is independently operated.
All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owners. All comments are property of their posters.
All other content is © Copyright 2002 - 2013 by 4Sight Media LLC.

Thinking of signing up for Vonage but have questions?
Business and Residential customers can call Toll Free 24 hours a day at: 1-888-692-8074
No Vonage Promotion Code or Coupon Codes are required at to receive any special,
best Vonage cheap deals, free sign up offers or discounts.

[ | | | | | ]

Vonage Forum Site Maps

Vonage | VoIP Forum | How VoIP Works | Wiring and Installation Page Two | International Rate Plans 2 | Internet Phone
Promotion | Vonage Review | VoIP | Broadband Phone | Free Month | Rebate | Vonnage | Vontage | VoIP | Phone Service
Phone | llamadas ilimitadas a Mexico | Latest News | VoIP Acronyms | Deal | Philippines Globe Phone | Site Maps

The Vonage Forum provides the Vonage sign up Best Offer Promotion Deal.
If you are considering signing up for Vonage and have found our Vonage News, Customer Reviews, Forums
& all other parts of this site useful, please use our Vonage Sign up page.

Vonage VoIP Phone Service is redefining communications by offering consumers
& small business VoIP Internet phones, an affordable alternative to traditional phone service.
The Vonage VoIP Forum Generated This Page In: 0.71 Seconds and 316 Pages In The Last 60 Seconds
The Vonage VoIP Forum