Sign up

Vonage Forum Menu

Vonage Forums
Vonage VoIP Forum
HildBeft Posted:
You can recollect
password by
connecting the
router to your pc
and open the

In The Forum:
Hard Wiring - Installation
How to arrive at wifi password?
On Oct 20, 2016 at 05:05:49

HildBeft Posted:
Great tips..
Thanks for sharing

In The Forum:
Hard Wiring - Installation
How to have Vonage and another land line?
On Oct 20, 2016 at 04:55:03

massrman Posted:
The devices are
available at
different price
margins , please
share your

In The Forum:
IP PBX for small business
On Sep 30, 2016 at 00:48:03

massrman Posted:
Hi these are most
commonly used SIP
PBX interops and

In The Forum:
IP PBX for small business
On Sep 30, 2016 at 00:37:45

Sammy00 Posted:
Has anyone setup a
W52p phone for
vonage? I have
a W52p with two
wireless handsets,

In The Forum:
Hard Wiring - Installation
W52p Setup
On Aug 30, 2016 at 10:38:01

James44 Posted:
Hi, I am
looking for a good
Sip Trunking
provider in
Canada. they
should offer

In The Forum:
A good sip trunking provider
On Jul 17, 2016 at 23:42:46

James44 Posted:
Which network
connection do you

In The Forum:
Wireless Access Point plugged into switch
On Jul 13, 2016 at 22:55:00

jjatsk Posted:
We are renting a
few offices right
next door to our
main building. I
have a wireless

In The Forum:
Wireless Access Point plugged into switch
On Jul 09, 2016 at 12:00:54

Pman Posted:
Hello, While
Vonage has been a
great service over
the years, it is
time to part

In The Forum:
LNP – Local Number Portability
Cannot port phone number to new carrier - repeated failures
On Jul 05, 2016 at 09:12:07

jbugz67 Posted:
We recently
purchased 5
Polycom VVX 300
phones from
Vonage, and have

In The Forum:
Nothing but problems with VVX300
On Apr 15, 2016 at 14:58:07

Vonage VoIP Forums

Vonage In The News
Vonage Holdings Corp. Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2013 Results

Carolyn Katz Elected to Board of Directors of Vonage Holdings Corp.


Vonage Customer Reviews
Vonage vs. Time Warner Cable SoCal
Vonage vs. Time Warner Cable SoCal

Vonage UK Review
Vonage UK Review

Vonage Pros and Cons for 2006
Vonage Pros and Cons for 2006

Vonage, a VT2142 and a RTP300, My Experiences - A Detailed Review
Vonage, a VT2142 and a RTP300, My Experiences - A Detailed Review

Salt Lake City: impressions after several months
Salt Lake City: impressions after several months

Vonage Reviews

Incumbents Push FCC On Question Of VoIP Regulation

Vonage In Print News

Incumbents Push FCC On Question Of Voip Regulation

January 30, 2004

By Josh Long

It is likely going to take at least a year before the FCC releases sweeping rules governing regulation of phone companies routing calls over the Internet. But the top U.S. telecom regulator is expected to clarify rules pertaining to some more narrow aspects of voice over IP as early as March.

Of course, FCC Chairman Michael Powell has repeatedly expressed his desire to leave nascent technologies, including VoIP, unregulated. "It [VoIP] is not a telephone service; it is a voice application, completely indistinguishable from any other kind of application that can run on an IP network," Reuters News Service quoted Powell as telling journalists at the World Economic Forum in January. "If you're going to say to me that voice over IP is something that needs regulation, then you're going to have to explain to me why e-mail isn't also, or streaming video or instant messaging is not also.”

But incumbent telcos and top politicians are pushing Powell and the rest of the FCC to provide more details on Voip regulatory requirements.

AT&T Corp. filed a petition with the FCC in October 2002, asking the federal agency whether Voip traffic originating and terminating on the PSTN is subject to switched access charges.

The regional Bells, in recent filings with the FCC, have also asked for details on Voip regulation.

And Congressman Billy Tauzin, chairman of The House Committee on Energy and Commerce, wrote a letter to Powell at the end of January, asking the agency to specify by Feb. 5 whether access charges apply to long-distance VoIP.

“I am extremely concerned that the commission’s continued failure to clarify the rules governing traffic over AT&T’s IP backbone could jeopardize our ability to keep telephone rates in rural areas affordable,” Tauzin said.

“I would simply like to know whether the traffic described in AT&T’s petition is subject to access charges today under the commission’s existing rules,” the congressman added. “Silence is not acceptable.”

Daniel Berninger, an independent analyst who has done work for Voip companies like, says it’s expected that the FCC will rule AT&T’s long-distance Voip service must be regulated. But he says the FCC is expected to find that the Internet-based voice service provided by is not subject to regulations., which operates Free World Dialup, filed a petition with the FCC more than a year ago asking the government agency to affirm that broadband Internet phone service should not be regulated. Free World Dialup members must buy special equipment and have a broadband connection to talk with one another over the Internet. The free calls are routed entirely over the Internet, according to the petition, and neither touch the PSTN nor a cell-phone network. Other Voip companies offer similar service.

Berninger says the FCC is expected to rule in March on the AT&T and petitions in concert with issuing its widely anticipated notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on VoIP. The NPRM is the government agency’s standard method for outlining its objectives and soliciting public comments before releasing new rules. Broad Voip rules are expected to be released in about a year.

Aids to Powell and FCC Commissioner Kevin Martin did not respond to a request for comment.

The FCC must rule on a separate Voip petition Level 3 Communications Inc. submitted by December, or March 2005, if the regulator seeks an extension. In December 2003, Level 3 filed a forbearance petition, asking the FCC to affirm rules that carriers are not required to pay local phone companies access charges for terminating calls on the PSTN when they originate in IP form.

Instead, Level 3 asserts, the carriers should pay reciprocal compensation charges under FCC rules. In the FCC filing, Level 3 says “such a reaffirmation has become timely and critical because LECs are asserting that access charges apply to such traffic with threats of lawsuits to collect such charges retroactively.”

The distinction between reciprocal compensation and access charges makes a huge difference to the bottom line of local phone companies. Under reciprocal compensation rules, carriers such as AT&T and Level 3 pay the Bells .07 cents a minute to terminate calls. By comparison, carriers shell out half a penny per minute if they are required to pay terminating access charges to local telcos. That makes access charges about seven times higher than reciprocal compensation fees.

The AT&T and Level 3 petitions highlight a central question vexing the entire industry. How can the FCC maintain its desired hands-off approach to Voip when part of the calls frequently touch the Bell network and other local networks, which are subject to a mountain of rules?

The regional Bells contend AT&T and other long-distance carriers must pay them access charges to originate and terminate long-distance Voip traffic on the PSTN. Verizon spokesman Larry Plumb says just because AT&T carries the long-distance portion of the call in IP “doesn’t make it an IP phone call.”

AT&T disagrees, citing two FCC documents, including a report the regulator submitted to Congress in 1998 focusing on the Universal Service Fund. In the comprehensive document to Congress -- often referred to as the Stevens report named after U.S. Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Ala.) - the FCC classified Voip into different categories and indicated its preferences for treating the various types of traffic. But the agency did not make any definitive finding.

Of great concern to AT&T is not only the possibility that the FCC would rule phone-to-phone Voip is subject to access charges, but that the agency would require AT&T to retroactively compensate the Bells for terminating calls dating back years.

In a joint meeting that AT&T and its rival SBC Communications Inc. held with FCC staff in December, “AT&T stressed that even if the commission could identify some legitimate basis for repealing the existing access charge exemption for phone-to-phone Voip traffic, there could be no possible basis to apply any such ruling retroactively,” David Lawson, an attorney representing AT&T, stated in a Dec. 22 letter to the FCC. “The entire industry has operated for years on the understanding that phone-to-phone Voip services have been exempt from access charges, and an about-face by the commission now would do extraordinary harm.”

The Bells dispute those remarks.

In a letter dated Jan. 22, Kathleen Grillo, vice president of federal regulatory advocacy at Verizon, called on the FCC to act swiftly on AT&T’s petition.

“AT&T’s service is run of the mill long-distance voice service that merely uses Internet protocol for some portion of a call’s transmission. These calls originate and terminate on the public switched telephone network and customers neither use nor need a broadband connection on either end of the calls,” Grillo wrote. “And AT&T’s service offers consumers none of the enhanced functionalities or new innovations that Voip providers can offer.

“There is nothing new or different about AT&T’s service. Nonetheless, while other interexchange carriers have been paying access charges on this traffic, AT&T is artificially calling its traditional long distance service ‘VoIP’ and has stopped paying access charges,” she said.

One company, perhaps more than any other, has brought Voip into the limelight over the last year: Vonage Holdings Corp.

In October 2003, Vonage also filed a petition with the FCC, asking the regulator to overturn a decision by the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission and affirm its Internet telephony service is an interstate service and not subject to telecommunications regulations.

A judge overturned the Minnesota regulator’s decision, but the PUC still had time to file an appeal.

The Vonage petition has broad ramifications for the entire industry. It is conceivable the FCC would not rule specifically on the petition but rather study the fundamental issues raised in its larger analysis of regulating VoIP.

This story also appeared in:
  • Phone Plus, 1/30/04

    Vonage Service Plans

    Vonage VoIP Members
    Members List Members
    New DeborahHux
    New Today 3
    Yesterday 1
    Total 98687

    Who Is On Site
    Visitors 106
    Members 1
    Total 107

    Vonage VoIP Forum Members:
    Login Here
    Not a Member? You can Register Here
    As a registered member you will have access to the VoIP Speed Test, Vonage Service Announcements and post comments in the
    Vonage VoIP Forums

    Vonage Stock Price
    Value: 6.43
    Change:   N/A
    Up to 15 Minute Delay

    Site Search

    Social Bookmarks
     Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

    †AK and HI residents pay $29.95 shipping. ††Limited time offer. Valid for residents of the United States (&DC), 18 years or older, who open new accounts. Offer good while supplies last and only on new account activations. One kit per account/household. Offer cannot be combined with any other discounts, promotions or plans and is not applicable to past purchases. Good while supplies last. Allow up to 2 weeks for shipping. Other restrictions may apply.

    1Unlimited calling and other services for all residential plans are based on normal residential, personal, non-commercial use. A combination of factors is used to determine abnormal use, including but not limited to: the number of unique numbers called, calls forwarded, minutes used and other factors. Subject to our Reasonable Use Policy and Terms of Service.

    2Shipping and activation fees waived with 1-year agreement. An Early Termination Fee (with periodic pro-rated reductions) applies if service is terminated before the end of the first 12 months. Additional restrictions may apply. See Terms of Service for details.

    HIGH SPEED INTERNET REQUIRED. †VALID FOR NEW LINES ONLY. RATES EXCLUDE INTERNET SERVICE, SURCHARGES, FEES AND TAXES. DEVICE MAY BE REFURBISHED. If you subscribe to plans with monthly minutes allotments, all call minutes placed from both from your home and registered ExtensionsTM phones will count toward your monthly minutes allotment. ExtensionsTM calls made from mobiles use airtime and may incur surcharges, depending on your mobile plan. Alarms, TTY and other systems may not be compatible. Vonage 911 service operates differently than traditional 911. See for details.

    ** Certain call types excluded. is not an official Vonage support website & is independently operated.
    All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owners. All comments are property of their posters.
    All other content is © Copyright 2002 - 2013 by 4Sight Media LLC.

    Thinking of signing up for Vonage but have questions?
    Business and Residential customers can call Toll Free 24 hours a day at: 1-888-692-8074
    No Vonage Promotion Code or Coupon Codes are required at to receive any special,
    best Vonage cheap deals, free sign up offers or discounts.

    [ | | | | | ]

    Vonage Forum Site Maps

    Vonage | VoIP Forum | How VoIP Works | Wiring and Installation Page Two | International Rate Plans 2 | Internet Phone
    Promotion | Vonage Review | VoIP | Broadband Phone | Free Month | Rebate | Vonnage | Vontage | VoIP | Phone Service
    Phone | llamadas ilimitadas a Mexico | Latest News | VoIP Acronyms | Deal | Philippines Globe Phone | Site Maps

    The Vonage Forum provides the Vonage sign up Best Offer Promotion Deal.
    If you are considering signing up for Vonage and have found our Vonage News, Customer Reviews, Forums
    & all other parts of this site useful, please use our Vonage Sign up page.

    Vonage VoIP Phone Service is redefining communications by offering consumers
    & small business VoIP Internet phones, an affordable alternative to traditional phone service.
    The Vonage VoIP Forum Generated This Page In: 0.69 Seconds and 359 Pages In The Last 60 Seconds
    The Vonage VoIP Forum