Sign up
 Vonage  

       
 
Vonage Forum Menu

Vonage Forums
Vonage VoIP Forum
Bruafekkay Posted:
agreed dingy
anybody, obviously
if the quarters is
not provided with
the requisite
...

In The Forum:
Vonage V-Phone & SoftPhone
Topic:
granit stelen beefy
On Dec 08, 2016 at 19:41:55

Bruafekkay Posted:
agreed drab
individual, large
if the hamlet is
not provided with
the requisite
...

In The Forum:
Vonage V-Phone & SoftPhone
Topic:
mauersteine 50x50 unsparing
On Dec 07, 2016 at 20:07:45

tplink Posted:
Im trying to add
my HT802 vonage
adapter to my home
network. I
currently have
...

In The Forum:
Hard Wiring - Installation
Topic:
Vonage behind switch
On Dec 05, 2016 at 06:35:11

DWSupport Posted:
After recent
Vonage update that
took place on the
4th and 5th of
Nov. E-mails with
...

In The Forum:
Vonage
Topic:
Voicemail Not Forwarding to Outlook Accounts
On Nov 10, 2016 at 12:23:26

peterlee Posted:
Had a call from a
Hospital in Ajax,
Ontario to my home
in
Scarborough, Onta
rio
...

In The Forum:
Vonage Canada
Topic:
Hospital Incoming call unable to connect
On Nov 08, 2016 at 11:59:50

TELLDOUG Posted:
I am looking for a
product that will
make my phone ring
louder so I can
hear using
...

In The Forum:
Vonage
Topic:
Looking for a ringer ameliorate
On Oct 26, 2016 at 09:21:30

HildBeft Posted:
You can recollect
password by
connecting the
router to your pc
and open the
browser
...

In The Forum:
Hard Wiring - Installation
Topic:
How to arrive at wifi password?
On Oct 20, 2016 at 05:05:49

HildBeft Posted:
Great tips..
Thanks for sharing
...

In The Forum:
Hard Wiring - Installation
Topic:
How to have Vonage and another land line?
On Oct 20, 2016 at 04:55:03

massrman Posted:
The devices are
available at
different price
margins , please
share your
estimated
...

In The Forum:
Vonage
Topic:
IP PBX for small business
On Sep 30, 2016 at 00:48:03

massrman Posted:
Hi these are most
commonly used SIP
PBX interops and
their
configuration
guides,
...

In The Forum:
Vonage
Topic:
IP PBX for small business
On Sep 30, 2016 at 00:37:45


Vonage VoIP Forums

Vonage In The News
Vonage Holdings Corp. Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2013 Results

Carolyn Katz Elected to Board of Directors of Vonage Holdings Corp.

Syndication

Vonage Customer Reviews
Vonage vs. Time Warner Cable SoCal
Vonage vs. Time Warner Cable SoCal



Vonage UK Review
Vonage UK Review



Vonage Pros and Cons for 2006
Vonage Pros and Cons for 2006



Vonage, a VT2142 and a RTP300, My Experiences - A Detailed Review
Vonage, a VT2142 and a RTP300, My Experiences - A Detailed Review



Salt Lake City: impressions after several months
Salt Lake City: impressions after several months




Vonage Reviews

FBI Targets Net Phoning


Vonage In Print News
July 29,2003

By Declan McCullagh

Internet telephone calls are fast becoming a national security threat that must be countered with new police wiretap rules, according to an FBI proposal presented quietly to regulators this month.

Learn More About Net Telephony

Representatives of the FBI's Electronic Surveillance Technology Section in Chantilly, Va., have met at least twice in the past three weeks with senior officials of the Federal Communications Commission to lobby for proposed new Internet eavesdropping rules. The FBI-drafted plan seeks to force broadband providers to provide more efficient, standardized surveillance facilities and could substantially change the way that cable modem and DSL (digital subscriber line) companies operate.

The new rules are necessary, because terrorists could otherwise frustrate legitimate wiretaps by placing phone calls over the Internet, warns a summary of a July 10 meeting with the FCC that the FBI prepared. "Broadband networks may ultimately replace narrowband networks," the summary says. "This trend offers increasing opportunities for terrorists, spies and criminals to evade lawful electronic surveillance."

In the last year, Internet telephony (also called voice over Internet Protocol, or VoIP) has grown increasingly popular among consumers and businesses with high-speed connections. Flat-rate plans cost between $20 and $40 a month for unlimited local and long-distance calls. One of the smaller Voip providers, Vonage, recently said it has about 34,000 customers and expects to have 1 million by late 2004.

According to the proposal that the FCC is considering, any company offering cable modem or DSL service to residences or businesses would be required to comply with a thicket of federal regulations that would establish a central hub for police surveillance of their customers. The proposal has alarmed civil libertarians who fear that it might jeopardize privacy and warn that the existence of such hubs could facilitate broad surveillance of other Internet communications such as e-mail, Web browsing and instant messaging.

Under existing federal wiretapping laws, the FBI already has the ability to seek a court order to conduct surveillance of any broadband user though its DCS1000 system, previously called Carnivore. But the bureau worries that unless Internet providers offer surveillance hubs based on common standards, lawbreakers can evade or, at the very least, complicate surveillance by using Voip providers such as Vonage, Time Warner Cable, Net2Phone, 8X8, deltathree and DigitalVoice.

Digital Wiretapping

The origins of this debate date back nine years, to when the FBI persuaded Congress to enact a controversial law called the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, or CALEA. Louis Freeh, FBI director at the time, testified in 1994 that emerging technologies such as call forwarding, call waiting and cellular phones had frustrated surveillance efforts. Congress responded to the FBI's concern by requiring that telecommunications services rewire their networks to provide police with guaranteed access for wiretaps. Legislators also granted the FCC substantial leeway in defining what types of companies must comply. So far, the FCC has interpreted CALEA's wiretap-ready requirements to cover only traditional analog and wireless telephone service

I think the FCC has a lot of room here," said Stewart Baker, a partner at Steptoe & Johnson http://www.steptoe.com who represents Internet service providers. "CALEA was written knowing that there would be new technologies for telecommunications." Baker, the former general counsel of the National Security Agency, said it was not clear whether the FBI had yet been frustrated by problems when wiretapping Voip calls.

Derek Khlopin, regulatory counsel at the Telecommunications Industry Association http://www.tiaonline.org, whose members include Cisco Systems, Ericsson, Lucent Technologies, Motorola and Nortel Networks, said what the FBI is "worried about is, when you have voice over DSL, if there's a way someone could say they're not subject to CALEA."

In a letter to the FCC, the FBI wrote: "CALEA applies to telecommunications carriers providing DSL and other types of wire line broadband access." Some members of Khlopin's trade association, such as Cisco, already manufacture products that follow CALEA guidelines. Khlopin said his group did not have a position on the FBI's request, but suggested that "CALEA is not the only way that law enforcement can get the bad guys."

The FBI's proposal has drawn criticism in regard to privacy issues. A representative of DSL provider Speakeasy said the company "does not support the extension of CALEA to ISPs, because the proposal appears to run counter to our commitment to protect our subscribers' privacy first and foremost. We certainly will be closely monitoring the progression of this particular proposal."

Barry Steinhardt, director of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)'s technology and liberty program, said the FCC could not legally extend CALEA to cover the Internet without additional action by Congress. "CALEA does not apply to 'information services,' which was the then term of art for the Internet," Steinhardt said. "Voice over IP is just that, a voice service over the Net. CALEA should not, and so far has not, applied to VOIP." The FBI proposal is before the FCC, which has jurisdiction over DSL and cable modem providers and is expected to rule on the matter this fall. "It's pending before the commission, and we plan to address the question," an FCC spokesman said.

How to Follow the Law

It's unclear what a broadband provider must do if the FCC extends CALEA's reach, and the regulations survive a possible court challenge from privacy groups such as the ACLU or network providers who do not wish to comply.

Martin King, an attorney in the FBI's general counsel's office who attended the July 10 meeting, said the bureau would not elaborate on its request to the FCC. "On this particular matter, we are going to decline to comment," King said.

Colleen Boothby, a former FCC official who is now a partner at Levine, Blaszak, Block & Boothby http://www.lb3law.com/html/boothby-text.html, said the implications of the FBI's proposal would vary based on how a broadband provider's system is configured.

"It's going to depend on what facilities they have," Boothby said. "When designing systems and configuring software and hardware, they have to preserve the government's ability to eavesdrop. Does it mean physical electrical closets? Does it mean an extra server in a secure room? It means as many varied things as there are variations in network design."

Lawrence Plumb, a spokesman for Verizon Communications, said: "How does a service provider architect its broadband network and equipment to be CALEA-compliant? The exact answer to 'how' isn't known."

Companies would be reimbursed for their costs to comply with CALEA. When enacting the law, Congress earmarked $500 million to reimburse telephone and cellular providers for their expenses.

Police encountered similar problems when wiretaps on customers using data services such as mMode from AT&T Wireless and PCS Vision from Sprint PCS could intercept only voice communications. Earlier this year, VeriSign, Cisco and other members of an industry consortium announced a set of products that would permit police to eavesdrop on wireless data transmissions.

FBI Meetings

The FBI appears to have first presented its proposal to the FCC last year. But in the July 10 and July 22 meetings, the bureau extended it to say that if broadband providers cannot isolate specific Voip calls to and from individual users, they must give police access to the "full pipe"--which, by including the complete simultaneous communications of hundreds or thousands of customers, could raise substantial privacy concerns.

A summary of the meeting prepared by the FBI said the FCC could "require carriers to make the full pipe available and leave law enforcement to perform the required minimization. This approach is already used when ISPs provide non-CALEA technical assistance for lawfully ordered electronic surveillance."

The July 22 meeting at the FCC included John Pignataro, deputy superintendent of Maryland's state police force, two attorneys for the FBI's Electronic Surveillance Technology Section, and Leslie Szwajkowski, the head of that section's policy unit. They met with a senior advisor to FCC Commissioner Kevin Martin. During the July 11 meeting, FBI representatives met with 10 officials from the FCC's Wireline Competition Bureau, its Media Bureau and the Office of Strategic Planning and Policy Analysis.

The meetings, according to summaries prepared by the FBI, stressed that "broadband telephony involves packet-mode communications, which are more difficult to intercept than circuit-mode communications. The need for CALEA-standardized broadband intercept capabilities is especially urgent in light of today's heightened threats to homeland security and the ongoing tendency of criminals to use the most clandestine modes of communication."

In an interview, however, a Vonage representative said the Voip provider had never received a request from a police agency to do a live voice interception, though the company has been served with subpoenas for stored customer information. "We have been subpoenaed, I believe, several times for call records and call data," Vonage's Brooke Schulz said. "We've responded to those subpoenas very, very quickly. Because of the way our service is set up, we have all this data on hand, and it's very easy to do."

Schulz said if Vonage were to receive a proper request to perform a live voice interception, it would be trivial to comply with, because all the company's Voip calls flow through central servers. "We are able to copy the data stream and send it in tandem to another location," Schulz said. "You can essentially send it to the law enforcement agency you need to send it to, as long as they have the proper equipment and the proper interconnect."

Because Vonage's network already is accessible to police armed with a legal wiretap order, Schulz said she was mystified by the FBI's proposal to the FCC. "We really don't know where it's coming from," she said.

Why the Proposal?

The FBI declined to elaborate on the justification for its proposal. An FBI agent who attended the pair of meetings and spoke on condition of anonymity said that "if it's pending, we don't want to be talking about it."

One explanation for the proposal is that not all Voip networks flow through a service that can be readily wiretapped. For instance, Pulver.com's Free World Dialup http://www.pulver.com/fwd connects about 38,000 subscribers in 150 countries who typically use Cisco ATA-186 and Cisco 7960 Voip phones to talk to each other directly.

The best place to intercept those types of Voip calls would likely be at the user's broadband provider.

A second explanation for the FBI's proposal is that, by requiring broadband providers to comply with CALEA, police would have an easier time wiretapping other types of Internet communications such as e-mail, Web browsing and instant-messaging services.

Yet another reason for the FBI's proposal, Baker said, is that the bureau is very interested in details about a Voip phone call, not just the conversation itself. Those details, such as who was on the call, are called "punch list items"

According to CALEA. "It's not about content but about getting call-identifying information or traffic analysis," Baker said. "Who was on the line, how long they stayed on, who did they put on hold--things like that. The FBI has always wanted to get that information served up very neatly, promptly and conveniently."

Some Internet providers have welcomed the FBI as an ally on this issue, which has arisen as part of an FCC proceeding over broadband deregulation and how to classify Internet access. By lobbying the FCC, the bureau is essentially seeking to expand the scope of CALEA, which says telecommunications services must ensure that their equipment and facilities are capable of "expeditiously isolating and enabling the government, pursuant to a court order or other lawful authorization," to intercept all communications from a specific customer.

FCC Chairman Michael Powell has indicated that he would like to move more Internet access services into the category of "information services," which have fewer regulations and likely would not be subject to CALEA. That alarms DSL providers such as EarthLink, which fear that deregulation means that former Baby Bells such as Verizon and BellSouth will raise their rates for access to the copper wire that runs to telephone subscribers' homes.

"The FBI is really an ally of sorts," said David Baker, EarthLink's vice president for law and public policy. "They're saying to the FCC, look, you guys are thinking of classifying everything as an information service, but you have to be aware of the implications."

EarthLink's Baker said "we're already seeing anticompetitive activities on the part of the phone companies even under the current rules. You do away with those rules, and you're ensuring that customers will have no choice but DSL provided by the phone company." Unless the FBI's proposal succeeds, he said, "everything that travels over a DSL connection, be it voice or e-mail, would be out of the reach of law enforcement. That would be a tremendous loophole and a breach of national security."

This story was also included in:
  • BusinessWeek Online, 7/29/03
  • ZDNET, 7/29/03



  •  
    Vonage Service Plans


    Vonage VoIP Members
    Members List Members
    New Ravin
    New Today 1
    Yesterday 9
    Total 99045

    Who Is On Site
    Visitors 110
    Members 0
    Total 110


    Vonage VoIP Forum Members:
    Login Here
    Not a Member? You can Register Here
    As a registered member you will have access to the VoIP Speed Test, Vonage Service Announcements and post comments in the
    Vonage VoIP Forums

    Vonage Stock Price
    Value: 6.99
    Change:   N/A
    Up to 15 Minute Delay

    Site Search
     

    Social Bookmarks
     Printer Friendly Printer Friendly








    †AK and HI residents pay $29.95 shipping. ††Limited time offer. Valid for residents of the United States (&DC), 18 years or older, who open new accounts. Offer good while supplies last and only on new account activations. One kit per account/household. Offer cannot be combined with any other discounts, promotions or plans and is not applicable to past purchases. Good while supplies last. Allow up to 2 weeks for shipping. Other restrictions may apply.

    1Unlimited calling and other services for all residential plans are based on normal residential, personal, non-commercial use. A combination of factors is used to determine abnormal use, including but not limited to: the number of unique numbers called, calls forwarded, minutes used and other factors. Subject to our Reasonable Use Policy and Terms of Service.

    2Shipping and activation fees waived with 1-year agreement. An Early Termination Fee (with periodic pro-rated reductions) applies if service is terminated before the end of the first 12 months. Additional restrictions may apply. See Terms of Service for details.

    HIGH SPEED INTERNET REQUIRED. †VALID FOR NEW LINES ONLY. RATES EXCLUDE INTERNET SERVICE, SURCHARGES, FEES AND TAXES. DEVICE MAY BE REFURBISHED. If you subscribe to plans with monthly minutes allotments, all call minutes placed from both from your home and registered ExtensionsTM phones will count toward your monthly minutes allotment. ExtensionsTM calls made from mobiles use airtime and may incur surcharges, depending on your mobile plan. Alarms, TTY and other systems may not be compatible. Vonage 911 service operates differently than traditional 911. See www.vonage.com/911 for details.

    ** Certain call types excluded.

    www.vonage-forum.com is not an official Vonage support website & is independently operated.
    All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owners. All comments are property of their posters.
    All other www.vonage-forum.com content is © Copyright 2002 - 2013 by 4Sight Media LLC.

    Thinking of signing up for Vonage but have questions?
    Business and Residential customers can call Toll Free 24 hours a day at: 1-888-692-8074
    No Vonage Promotion Code or Coupon Codes are required at www.vonage.com to receive any special,
    best Vonage cheap deals, free sign up offers or discounts.

    [ | | | | | ]

    Vonage Forum Site Maps

    Vonage | VoIP Forum | How VoIP Works | Wiring and Installation Page Two | International Rate Plans 2 | Internet Phone
    Promotion | Vonage Review | VoIP | Broadband Phone | Free Month | Rebate | Vonnage | Vontage | VoIP | Phone Service
    Phone | llamadas ilimitadas a Mexico | Latest News | VoIP Acronyms | Deal | Philippines Globe Phone | Site Maps

    The Vonage Forum provides the Vonage sign up Best Offer Promotion Deal.
    If you are considering signing up for Vonage and have found our Vonage News, Customer Reviews, Forums
    & all other parts of this site useful, please use our Vonage Sign up page.


    Vonage VoIP Phone Service is redefining communications by offering consumers
    & small business VoIP Internet phones, an affordable alternative to traditional phone service.
    The Vonage VoIP Forum Generated This Page In: 0.65 Seconds and 265 Pages In The Last 60 Seconds
    The Vonage VoIP Forum