Sign up

Vonage Forum Menu

Vonage Forums
Vonage VoIP Forum
Tomekaxali Posted:
Czy wiesz, co to
jest druk
banerowy? Jest to
rodzaj nadruku

In The Forum:
Rollupy reklamowe na czas u nas
On Apr 23, 2017 at 09:03:53

xing33 Posted:
In The Forum:
Vonage UK
On Apr 22, 2017 at 12:49:38

xing33 Posted:
In The Forum:
Vonage Canada
On Apr 22, 2017 at 12:45:21

diazou Posted:
Hello, It's
compatible with
Android your phone
? Thanks!

In The Forum:
IP PBX for small business
On Mar 28, 2017 at 07:42:33

jeddaisg Posted:
Hi all We have
a Vonage VOIP
system for our
office. Lately,
our call quality

In The Forum:
Ethernet Cable; Wiring schematic? 568-B?
On Feb 23, 2017 at 12:33:52

beast321 Posted:
I don't know if
you heard, that
many more
Dreamcast games
are opened up

In The Forum:
Fax - Tivo - Alarms
Using phone as a dial up modem for Dreamcast Gaming
On Feb 15, 2017 at 21:16:51

Av8rix Posted:
In The Forum:
New adapter and router -- MAC change
On Jan 10, 2017 at 19:07:21

tplink Posted:
Im trying to add
my HT802 vonage
adapter to my home
network. I
currently have

In The Forum:
Hard Wiring - Installation
Vonage behind switch
On Dec 05, 2016 at 06:35:11

DWSupport Posted:
After recent
Vonage update that
took place on the
4th and 5th of
Nov. E-mails with

In The Forum:
Voicemail Not Forwarding to Outlook Accounts
On Nov 10, 2016 at 12:23:26

peterlee Posted:
Had a call from a
Hospital in Ajax,
Ontario to my home
Scarborough, Onta

In The Forum:
Vonage Canada
Hospital Incoming call unable to connect
On Nov 08, 2016 at 11:59:50

Vonage VoIP Forums

Vonage In The News
Vonage Holdings Corp. Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2013 Results

Carolyn Katz Elected to Board of Directors of Vonage Holdings Corp.


Vonage Customer Reviews
Vonage vs. Time Warner Cable SoCal
Vonage vs. Time Warner Cable SoCal

Vonage UK Review
Vonage UK Review

Vonage Pros and Cons for 2006
Vonage Pros and Cons for 2006

Vonage, a VT2142 and a RTP300, My Experiences - A Detailed Review
Vonage, a VT2142 and a RTP300, My Experiences - A Detailed Review

Salt Lake City: impressions after several months
Salt Lake City: impressions after several months

Vonage Reviews

FCC Takes Lead On VoIP Rules

Vonage In Print News

FCC Takes Lead On Voip Rules

November 15, 2004

By Staff

Washington — In a sweeping decision, the Federal Communications Commission has elbowed the states aside and seized command in deciding the regulatory fate of voice-over-Internet protocol (VoIP) service, a novel technology that has the potential to rattle the phone market like never before.

The FCC ruling last Tuesday was a victory for Vonage Holdings Corp., which is waging a court battle against Minnesota regulators, after they attempted to treat the company, with 300,000 Voip customers, like a traditional phone carrier.


In an unexpected move that rewarded last-minute lobbying by the cable industry, the FCC also held that cable Voip — to the extent it shares characteristics similar with Vonage — would also be shielded from state regulation.

The FCC has yet to enumerate the characteristics that would qualify cable Voip for equal treatment.

“The decision today decides who has to decide,” said FCC chairman Michael Powell, a big believer that Voip has revolutionary consequences for the telecommunications industry.

The FCC vote was unanimous, but the many objections voiced by FCC Democrats Michael Copps and Jonathan Adelstein gave the ruling the same partisan feel as so many deregulatory actions advanced by Powell and his GOP allies at the FCC, Kevin Martin and Kathleen Abernathy.

The FCC ruling was a setback for many state regulators, who wanted to maintain their grip on Voip to protect $1.9 billion in revenue used to subsidize affordable phone service for poor and rural customers.

Originally, FCC staffers proposed to limit the ruling to Vonage, but elements within the cable industry objected, arguing that the FCC should not hand Vonage an unwarranted regulatory advantage.

Over the past few weeks, the National Cable & Telecommunications Association, Cox Communications Inc. and Time Warner Inc. pressured the commission to broaden the scope of its ruling.


Abernathy and Martin, in particular, adopted cable’s cause and won the internal battle to broaden the staff’s recommendation to include not just cable Voip but any player that shared Vonage’s characteristics, including Verizon Communications Inc. and SBC Communications Inc. No one at the FCC named an extant Voip service that would fall outside the boundaries of the ruling.

Based in Edison, N.J., privately held Vonage is a Voip pioneer. Its service rides on broadband connections provided to homes and offices by cable and phone companies.

Vonage and other Voip providers that lack their own facilities control about two-thirds of the small-but-growing IP-telephony market.

But The Yankee Group has predicted that by the end of 2005, cable and phone companies will use their brands and financial muscle to put enormous pressure on non-facilities-based Voip players.

In a recent report, Yankee analyst Kate Griffin estimated non-facilities Voip providers would lose 47% of their market share.

“In the next several months, these early-market entrants will face tough competition from battle-tested telephone and cable MSOs ready to fight for local Voip leadership,” Griffin wrote.

Yankee Group also estimated that Voip companies would serve 1 million subscribers by the end of 2004 and 17 million by the end of 2008.

Nonetheless, in reaction to the FCC’s decision, Vonage CEO Jeffrey Citron said, “This forward-thinking decision from the FCC assures that competition from Voip is here to stay.”


The FCC’s ruling pre-empted state action with regard to three requirements Minnesota tried to impose on Vonage: certification (the need to gain state permission to provide VoIP); tariffing (the need to post prices before launching service); and 911 service (the need to link Voip users to police, fire and ambulance services.)

As a result of the ruling, cable companies that offer Voip can bypass the certification process, establish and alter pricing plans freely; and roll out 911 services on their own timetable.

The FCC pulled the plug on the states by holding that Voip service was inherently an interstate offering, and adding that the constitution assigned the regulation of interstate commerce to the federal government.

“To subject a global network to disparate local regulatory treatment by 51 different jurisdictions would be to destroy the very qualities that embody the technological marvel that is the Internet,” Powell said moments before the vote.


The states were not totally pushed aside. The FCC did nothing to interfere with their authority to enforce consumer-protection laws concerning, for example, fraud and false advertising. The agency also left the door open for state taxation of Voip revenue.

Many cable companies — including Time Warner, Comcast Corp. and Cablevision Systems Corp. — have already received state permission to provide either circuit-switched or Voip services. The real benefit from the FCC’s ruling derives from the knowledge that cable operators won’t have to cope with a patchwork of regulations varying from state to state.

“By establishing a national framework for the regulation of Voip services, the FCC has taken a significant step toward promoting competition in enhanced voice services,” NCTA president Robert Sachs said in a prepared statement.

The FCC gave Vonage only half of what it wanted. Vonage also asked the FCC to rule that its Digital Voice service is an information service, not a telecommunications service, under federal communications law.

Without explanation, the FCC postponed a decision on classifying VoIP. If Voip were dubbed an information service, it would function in the same deregulatory climate as e-mail and instant messaging.


But there is a potential downside: Information-service providers are not automatically accorded the same rights as telecommunications-service providers. Cable Voip as an information service could mean higher pole-attachment fees; problems with securing access to new poles and conduits; and difficulties regarding interconnection with, and obtaining compensation from, other Voip providers and traditional phone carriers.

The NCTA has asked the FCC to ensure that freedoms granted to information-service providers do not disable cable Voip services from competing because they lack the legal protections granted telecommunications carriers.

The FCC’s ruling showed policy decisions can change from the time staff prepares a recommendation to when the votes are actually cast.

FCC staff once explained that Vonage was actually quite different from cable VoIP, because Vonage routes traffic over the public Internet (cable uses private networks) and offers a nomadic service, meaning consumers can plug into any broadband connection using the same phone number. Time Warner Cable’s “Digital Phone” Voip offering, for example, does not share this nomadic quality now.

But those two characteristics were not the ones the agency relied upon in deciding that its pre-emption decision would cover both Vonage and cable VoIP, FCC sources said.

Instead, the FCC concluded that Vonage and cable Voip were similar because both offered a comparable suite of features and functions; used a broadband connection; and used customer-premises equipment compatible with IP technology.


The FCC also relied on the fact that Vonage and cable Voip route traffic over networks that do not oblige state boundaries.

“The order is very specific. It states that to the extent that these other entities are offering services that have similar characteristics [to Vonage], as we have defined those characteristics in the order, then, yes, there would be a similar pre-emptive effect,” said Jeff Carlisle, chief of the FCC’s Wireline Competition Bureau.

Copps and Adelstein concurred with the ruling, but voiced concerns that the agency was acting in a piecemeal fashion.

“There are, in fact, difficult and urgent questions flowing from our jurisdictional conclusion, and they are no closer to an answer after we act today than they were before we walked in here,” Copps said.

Vonage Service Plans

Vonage VoIP Members
Members List Members
New josephoa60
New Today 6
Yesterday 4
Total 100337

Who Is On Site
Visitors 163
Members 1
Total 164

Vonage VoIP Forum Members:
Login Here
Not a Member? You can Register Here
As a registered member you will have access to the VoIP Speed Test, Vonage Service Announcements and post comments in the
Vonage VoIP Forums

Vonage Stock Price
Value: 6.505
Change:   N/A
Up to 15 Minute Delay

Site Search

Social Bookmarks
 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

†AK and HI residents pay $29.95 shipping. ††Limited time offer. Valid for residents of the United States (&DC), 18 years or older, who open new accounts. Offer good while supplies last and only on new account activations. One kit per account/household. Offer cannot be combined with any other discounts, promotions or plans and is not applicable to past purchases. Good while supplies last. Allow up to 2 weeks for shipping. Other restrictions may apply.

1Unlimited calling and other services for all residential plans are based on normal residential, personal, non-commercial use. A combination of factors is used to determine abnormal use, including but not limited to: the number of unique numbers called, calls forwarded, minutes used and other factors. Subject to our Reasonable Use Policy and Terms of Service.

2Shipping and activation fees waived with 1-year agreement. An Early Termination Fee (with periodic pro-rated reductions) applies if service is terminated before the end of the first 12 months. Additional restrictions may apply. See Terms of Service for details.

HIGH SPEED INTERNET REQUIRED. †VALID FOR NEW LINES ONLY. RATES EXCLUDE INTERNET SERVICE, SURCHARGES, FEES AND TAXES. DEVICE MAY BE REFURBISHED. If you subscribe to plans with monthly minutes allotments, all call minutes placed from both from your home and registered ExtensionsTM phones will count toward your monthly minutes allotment. ExtensionsTM calls made from mobiles use airtime and may incur surcharges, depending on your mobile plan. Alarms, TTY and other systems may not be compatible. Vonage 911 service operates differently than traditional 911. See for details.

** Certain call types excluded. is not an official Vonage support website & is independently operated.
All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owners. All comments are property of their posters.
All other content is © Copyright 2002 - 2013 by 4Sight Media LLC.

Thinking of signing up for Vonage but have questions?
Business and Residential customers can call Toll Free 24 hours a day at: 1-888-692-8074
No Vonage Promotion Code or Coupon Codes are required at to receive any special,
best Vonage cheap deals, free sign up offers or discounts.

[ | | | | | ]

Vonage Forum Site Maps

Vonage | VoIP Forum | How VoIP Works | Wiring and Installation Page Two | International Rate Plans 2 | Internet Phone
Promotion | Vonage Review | VoIP | Broadband Phone | Free Month | Rebate | Vonnage | Vontage | VoIP | Phone Service
Phone | llamadas ilimitadas a Mexico | Latest News | VoIP Acronyms | Deal | Philippines Globe Phone | Site Maps

The Vonage Forum provides the Vonage sign up Best Offer Promotion Deal.
If you are considering signing up for Vonage and have found our Vonage News, Customer Reviews, Forums
& all other parts of this site useful, please use our Vonage Sign up page.

Vonage VoIP Phone Service is redefining communications by offering consumers
& small business VoIP Internet phones, an affordable alternative to traditional phone service.
The Vonage VoIP Forum Generated This Page In: 0.74 Seconds and 506 Pages In The Last 60 Seconds
The Vonage VoIP Forum