Sign up

Vonage Forum Menu

Vonage Forums
Vonage VoIP Forum
diazou Posted:
Hello, It's
compatible with
Android your phone
? Thanks!

In The Forum:
IP PBX for small business
On Mar 28, 2017 at 07:42:33

jeddaisg Posted:
Hi all We have
a Vonage VOIP
system for our
office. Lately,
our call quality

In The Forum:
Ethernet Cable; Wiring schematic? 568-B?
On Feb 23, 2017 at 12:33:52

beast321 Posted:
I don't know if
you heard, that
many more
Dreamcast games
are opened up

In The Forum:
Fax - Tivo - Alarms
Using phone as a dial up modem for Dreamcast Gaming
On Feb 15, 2017 at 21:16:51

Av8rix Posted:
In The Forum:
New adapter and router -- MAC change
On Jan 10, 2017 at 19:07:21

tplink Posted:
Im trying to add
my HT802 vonage
adapter to my home
network. I
currently have

In The Forum:
Hard Wiring - Installation
Vonage behind switch
On Dec 05, 2016 at 06:35:11

DWSupport Posted:
After recent
Vonage update that
took place on the
4th and 5th of
Nov. E-mails with

In The Forum:
Voicemail Not Forwarding to Outlook Accounts
On Nov 10, 2016 at 12:23:26

peterlee Posted:
Had a call from a
Hospital in Ajax,
Ontario to my home
Scarborough, Onta

In The Forum:
Vonage Canada
Hospital Incoming call unable to connect
On Nov 08, 2016 at 11:59:50

I am looking for a
product that will
make my phone ring
louder so I can
hear using

In The Forum:
Looking for a ringer ameliorate
On Oct 26, 2016 at 09:21:30

HildBeft Posted:
You can recollect
password by
connecting the
router to your pc
and open the

In The Forum:
Hard Wiring - Installation
How to arrive at wifi password?
On Oct 20, 2016 at 05:05:49

HildBeft Posted:
Great tips..
Thanks for sharing

In The Forum:
Hard Wiring - Installation
How to have Vonage and another land line?
On Oct 20, 2016 at 04:55:03

Vonage VoIP Forums

Vonage In The News
Vonage Holdings Corp. Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2013 Results

Carolyn Katz Elected to Board of Directors of Vonage Holdings Corp.


Vonage Customer Reviews
Vonage vs. Time Warner Cable SoCal
Vonage vs. Time Warner Cable SoCal

Vonage UK Review
Vonage UK Review

Vonage Pros and Cons for 2006
Vonage Pros and Cons for 2006

Vonage, a VT2142 and a RTP300, My Experiences - A Detailed Review
Vonage, a VT2142 and a RTP300, My Experiences - A Detailed Review

Salt Lake City: impressions after several months
Salt Lake City: impressions after several months

Vonage Reviews

CEA Hails FCC Decision To Preempt State Regulation Of VoIP

Vonage In Print News

CEA Hails FCC Decision To Preempt State Regulation Of Voip Services

November 12, 2004

By Edie Herman

Vonage's DigitalVoice Voip service is interstate, so it can't be regulated by state PUCs, the FCC ruled Tues. The ruling was hailed by CEA, which said the FCC's action "provides the appropriate framework to establish one federal nationwide Voip policy."

The ruling, which asserts federal jurisdiction over Vonage-like services, came in response to a preemption petition filed last year by Vonage. Although referring to Vonage service, the decision applies to other types of IP- enabled services, the Commission said. CEA Pres. Gary Shapiro said the advancement of Voip services would be "a key element in driving consumer demand and adoption" of broadband technology. There's "a unique synergy between Voip and broadband that allows each to be used as a purchase incentive for the other," he said. The Commission's action was "a strong step toward regulatory clarity, which is needed to advance Voip services that will provide enormous benefits to consumers and the economy," Shapiro said. "We commend the FCC's leadership in taking action to avoid a patchwork of state regulations that would stifle the advancement of this new form of communication."

FCC Wireline Bureau Chief Jeffrey Carlisle told reporters the Commission acted now on the jurisdiction issue -- rather than waiting for action on the broader IP- Enabled Services proceeding -- because the 8th U.S. Appeals Court, St. Louis, is set to hold an oral argument Nov. 17 on the same issue. By acting now, the FCC adds its expertise to the court's deliberation, Carlisle said. "We want to get as much clarity out as possible," he said.

The FCC's decision -- and the 8th Circuit oral argument -- stem from a Minn. PUC decision last year finding that Vonage is a telephone service subject to traditional regulation such a requirement to provide E-911 similar to that offered by ILECs. On an appeal by Vonage, a lower court overrode the PUC's decision. The 8th Circuit is considering the PUC's appeal of that ruling. Vonage asked the FCC to rule that its Voip service is interstate and thus shouldn't be regulated by states -- the action the FCC took Tues.

FCC commissioners said they decided it wasn't possible to separate intrastate from interstate calls because of the nature of IP telephony, so the service had to be considered interstate. It was a "pretty basic preemption analysis," said Comr. Abernathy. "We don't enter the business of preempting lightly," she said. The Commission found that regulations imposed by the Minn. PUC "were inconsistent with the FCC's deregulatory policies and that preemption was consistent with federal law and policies intended to promote the continued development of the Internet, broadband and interactive services," the FCC said in a news release.

The FCC news release offered a glimpse of what some said was heavy lobbying by cable companies to gain protections similar to those Vonage received, for services they offered. The news release said the decision applied to "other types of IP-enabled services such as those offered by cable companies," but it didn't elaborate. An FCC spokesman said the order, expected out within 2 weeks, will list the characteristics of a Voip service that would be considered "similar" to Vonage and thus covered by the order. "Cable has some of those characteristics," he said, adding he couldn't speak further until the order came out.

At issue is a situation in which a cable company acts not just as a conduit for other companies' Voip services but offers its own Voip service to customers. Medley Global Advisors said in a report that "the inclusion of cable telephony into the basket of services that qualify as interstate under today's decision... will provide cable with a stronger legal rationale for making its information service claim if challenged in court." Comr. Abernathy said the order is intended to cover "all Voip services that integrate voice communications capabilities with enhanced features and entail the interstate routing of packets -- whether provided by application service providers, cable operators, LECs or others."

The FCC didn't rule on the heated issue of whether the Voip service was a telecom or information service. That issue will be dealt with in the IP-Enabled Services proceeding, the Commission said. The FCC also said this decision doesn't signal an intent to let Vonage stop seeking ways to provide E-911. That and other public safety issues will be addressed in the IP-Enabled Services proceeding, along with whether Voip providers must provide access to the disabled, pay intercarrier compensation and contribute to the universal service fund, the Commission said.

The FCC emphasized that its ruling doesn't affect other state regulatory roles such as consumer protection. Comrs. Copps and Adelstein concurred in the decision. Copps objected to dealing with the Vonage petition separately from the bigger IP proceeding. The Commission has been making too many "piecemeal" decisions rather than setting a broad framework, he said. Adelstein said he was concerned about "unintended results" of the order, including jeopardizing the universal service program. Comr. Martin said he shared concerns about the effect the order could have on pending issues such as intercarrier compensation but he didn't think that should stop the FCC from acting on the Vonage order.

Chmn. Powell responded to Copps' concerns about the limited nature of the order, saying it would be a "formula for paralysis" to defer action until all issues could be dealt with at once. Sometimes it's in consumers' interest to act on individual issues like this, he said. "Today's decision lays a jurisdictional foundation for what consumers already know -- that the Internet is global in scope," Powell said. "To subject a global network to disparate local regulatory treatment by 51 different jurisdictions would be to destroy the very qualities that embody the technological marvel that is the Internet." Powell said the action doesn't mean there's no governmental interest in VoIP: "There will remain very important questions about emergency services, consumer protections from waste, fraud and abuse and recovering the fair costs of the network. It is not true that states are or should be complete bystanders with regard to these issues." He said the order preempts a Minn. PUC decision applying its "traditional telephone company" regulations to Vonage's service, but "I emphasize that the Commission expresses no opinion here on the applicability to Vonage of the state's general laws governing entities conducting business... such as laws concerning taxation, fraud, general commercial dealings, marketing and advertising."

Abernathy said it would have been ideal if the FCC could have dealt with E-911, universal service and other important matters before addressing the jurisdiction issue.

However, she said: "The decision of several states to impose utility regulations on Voip services, and the ensuing litigation arising from such forays, makes it imperative for the Commission to establish our exclusive jurisdiction as the first order of business. This Commission runs significant risks if we remain on the sidelines and leave it to the courts to grapple with such issues of national import without the benefit of the expert agency's views."

Vonage CEO Jeffrey Citron called the FCC decision "forward-thinking" and said Vonage can now "focus our resources exclusively on building an even better service," including rolling out E-911 service. "Because the FCC has acknowledged the reality of the Internet -- which knows no state boundaries and no borders -- more people will enjoy the benefits of Internet phone service," he said.

Vonage Service Plans

Vonage VoIP Members
Members List Members
New ClyzeMax
New Today 7
Yesterday 4
Total 100338

Who Is On Site
Visitors 189
Members 0
Total 189

Vonage VoIP Forum Members:
Login Here
Not a Member? You can Register Here
As a registered member you will have access to the VoIP Speed Test, Vonage Service Announcements and post comments in the
Vonage VoIP Forums

Vonage Stock Price
Value: 6.47
Change:   N/A
Up to 15 Minute Delay

Site Search

Social Bookmarks
 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

†AK and HI residents pay $29.95 shipping. ††Limited time offer. Valid for residents of the United States (&DC), 18 years or older, who open new accounts. Offer good while supplies last and only on new account activations. One kit per account/household. Offer cannot be combined with any other discounts, promotions or plans and is not applicable to past purchases. Good while supplies last. Allow up to 2 weeks for shipping. Other restrictions may apply.

1Unlimited calling and other services for all residential plans are based on normal residential, personal, non-commercial use. A combination of factors is used to determine abnormal use, including but not limited to: the number of unique numbers called, calls forwarded, minutes used and other factors. Subject to our Reasonable Use Policy and Terms of Service.

2Shipping and activation fees waived with 1-year agreement. An Early Termination Fee (with periodic pro-rated reductions) applies if service is terminated before the end of the first 12 months. Additional restrictions may apply. See Terms of Service for details.

HIGH SPEED INTERNET REQUIRED. †VALID FOR NEW LINES ONLY. RATES EXCLUDE INTERNET SERVICE, SURCHARGES, FEES AND TAXES. DEVICE MAY BE REFURBISHED. If you subscribe to plans with monthly minutes allotments, all call minutes placed from both from your home and registered ExtensionsTM phones will count toward your monthly minutes allotment. ExtensionsTM calls made from mobiles use airtime and may incur surcharges, depending on your mobile plan. Alarms, TTY and other systems may not be compatible. Vonage 911 service operates differently than traditional 911. See for details.

** Certain call types excluded. is not an official Vonage support website & is independently operated.
All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owners. All comments are property of their posters.
All other content is © Copyright 2002 - 2013 by 4Sight Media LLC.

Thinking of signing up for Vonage but have questions?
Business and Residential customers can call Toll Free 24 hours a day at: 1-888-692-8074
No Vonage Promotion Code or Coupon Codes are required at to receive any special,
best Vonage cheap deals, free sign up offers or discounts.

[ | | | | | ]

Vonage Forum Site Maps

Vonage | VoIP Forum | How VoIP Works | Wiring and Installation Page Two | International Rate Plans 2 | Internet Phone
Promotion | Vonage Review | VoIP | Broadband Phone | Free Month | Rebate | Vonnage | Vontage | VoIP | Phone Service
Phone | llamadas ilimitadas a Mexico | Latest News | VoIP Acronyms | Deal | Philippines Globe Phone | Site Maps

The Vonage Forum provides the Vonage sign up Best Offer Promotion Deal.
If you are considering signing up for Vonage and have found our Vonage News, Customer Reviews, Forums
& all other parts of this site useful, please use our Vonage Sign up page.

Vonage VoIP Phone Service is redefining communications by offering consumers
& small business VoIP Internet phones, an affordable alternative to traditional phone service.
The Vonage VoIP Forum Generated This Page In: 1.70 Seconds and 322 Pages In The Last 60 Seconds
The Vonage VoIP Forum